READINGS: 05/12/2019 ~ Fourth Sunday of Easter ~ *Acts 9:36-43; Psalm 23; Revelation 7:9-17; John 10:22-30 ~ *During Eastertide a reading from Acts is often substituted for the lesson from the Hebrew Bible ~ Mother’s Day on the Secular Calendar ~ The Sacrament of Baptism.

High Christology

“I give them eternal life, and they will never be lost. No one will ever snatch them from my hand. Abba, God, who gave them to me is greater than anyone and no one can steal them from the hand of Abba, God, for Abba and I are one.” — John 10:29-30

I’d like to start by asking a question and inviting you to think about your answer. Mind you, I am not inviting you to think about a correct answer or think about a text book answer or think about someone else’s answer. I am inviting you to think about your answer.

The question: why are there four Gospels, four very different, diverse ways of telling the story of Jesus in the Christian Scriptures? We shall come back to this question eventually.

But let’s leave that question aside for a time. As you know, we experienced the Sacrament of Baptism today. We Baptized children so we had some questions for the parents.

And we also had questions for the Congregation. This was asked: “Do you who witness and celebrate this sacrament, promise your love, support and care to the ones about to be baptized, as they live and grow in Christ?”

I invite you to think about your answer to that question. Mind you, I am not inviting you to think about a correct answer or think about a text book answer or think about someone else’s answer. I am inviting you to think about your answer. (Slight pause.)

One of my mentors in seminary said to me we are Congregationalist and the Congregation, the local church, is the most important unit in our structure. This pastor, being a seminary mentor said, therefore, the most important function for those called to ordained ministry is to be a local pastor.

I took that piece of advice to heart. And, if you have ever dialed up my sermon blog on the internet, you will notice the name of the blog is <localpastor>— that’s all small case letters with no break— <localpastor>.

Among several key understandings which emerged from the Reformation about Scripture, a central idea about what it means to be a Christian is that we are, all of us, priests. Each of us is a priest.

We are a priesthood of believers. As a priesthood of believers, together we are called to ministry of some form. Indeed, I want to suggest if we are all a priesthood of believers then we are all also called to be local pastors of some form. (Slight pause.)

We find these words in the work know as the Gospel According to the School of John: “I give them eternal life, and they will never be lost. No one will ever snatch them from my hand. Abba, God, who gave them to me is greater than anyone and no one can steal them from the hand of Abba, God, for Abba and I are one.” (Slight pause.)

[The pastor holds up a 30 page document.] This is a publication of the Word Council of Churches titled Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry. [1] The World Council is both broad and inclusive among its many expressions of the membership. The goal of the organization is to seek Christian unity.

In pursuit of this it brings together denominations in more than 110 countries and includes churches in the Anglican, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist and Reformed traditions. There are now 350 member church groups.

For the member churches this is a unique space in which they can reflect, speak, act, challenge and support, share and debate with each other, worship and work together. These churches are called to the goal of a visible unity in one faith.

They strive to promote a common witness in work. They engage in service by tending to human needs, breaking down barriers between people, seeking justice, peace, upholding the integrity of creation, fostering renewal in worship, mission and service.

As the title Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry implies this document lays out places where these churches agree and even disagree in those three areas. I ask the parents of children who are Baptized to read the Baptism section.

Given the approaching time of transition, last week I realized it might be a good idea for our Deacons to read it also. So I gave them a copy.

In fact, given the approaching time of transition it might be a good idea for every member of this congregation to read it. Why? You see, we are all a priesthood of believers. And indeed, if you want to rad this document we can print it for you or e-mail a copy to you.

But what I really want you to notice is, because the World Council is who they are, this document lays out all the places in these three areas— Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry— lays out all the places where that multitude of churches I mentioned both agree and disagree. Agree and disagree— that’s what I really want you to notice— agree and disagree. (Slight pause.)

Now I invite you to imagine something. Imagine yourself not here in this church but in any church in the world. Question: is it probable any two people sitting next to one another in any church anywhere believe exactly the same thing about God? Probably not.

And now put yourself back here in this Congregation. Is it probable you believe exactly what any other person here believes about God? Probably not.

That brings me back to my question about the four Gospels. Why are there four Gospels, four very different, diverse ways of telling the story of Jesus in the Christian Scriptures? (Slight pause.)

Among the incontrovertible facts we know about these four works are that Mark was written first, Matthew next, Luke next and John last. As I have said dozens of times before, the true letters of Paul were completed before any of he Gospels were recorded. Hence, the Gospels are not the earliest writings in the Christian Scriptures.

As to Mark, Matthew and Luke— these are the so called Synoptic Gospels. Synoptic means one eye and they’ve been given that collective name since each of these Gospels records the story of Jesus in roughly the same way.

And we can even see where Luke takes some material from Matthew and Mark and Matthew takes some material from Mark because they’re written in that sequence and they probably read each other’s work. John, on the other hand, approaches things in a totally different way and there is very little if any material taken from the others.

But given that sequence, one which follows the development of the Gospels, another reality presents itself. In Mark the Jesus is portrayed as being more human than divine and by the time you get to John Jesus is portrayed as more divine than human.

But did Jesus change or did the way the early Christians understand Jesus change? Or, indeed, did the experience that the early Christians had of Jesus change?

This is clear. In Mark Jesus claims to be the Messiah. In John Jesus claims to be the Messiah and says Abba and I— God and I— are one.

Are those statements different? Maybe, maybe not. But this should also be clear to all of us. To claim all of the Gospels— even the Synoptics— the claim that are totally in sync with each other, that they totally agree with each other is a long, long stretch.

Why? The Gospels are not— are not— in any way trying to convey a factual story or even facts about Jesus. The Gospels are trying to convey theology. The Gospels are trying to convey ideas about how God might be understood.

And all that brings me to a very basic question: what do you believe? (Slight pause.) Not a text book answer, not anyone else’ answer— what do you believe? If the Gospels are not trying to convey the story of Jesus but trying to convey theology, what are the Gospels saying about God? And, if the Gospels are not trying to convey the story of Jesus but trying to convey theology, how should we respond? (Slight pause.)

You remember that promise made in the Baptism ceremony? It was a promise to offer our love, our support, our care.

For me, those promises say two things. First, we are all a priesthood of believers. We are all local pastors.

Second, what Christian theology really says, what the story of Jesus really says, what the Gospels really say is God— God who covenants with us— God promises to love, care and support us. And God, who covenants with us, invites us to love, care and support one another.

You see, we may not believe all the same things but we are all members of the priesthood of believers. That is especially true because as a priesthood of believers we are called to show our love, our support and our care to others. Amen.

05/12/2019
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I have used this quote before. It is from the Catholic theologian Richard Rhor. (Quote:) “Christianity is a lifestyle— a way of being in the world that is simple, non-violent, shared and loving. However, we made it into an established religion (and all that goes with that) and avoided the lifestyle itself. Making Christianity into a religions one could then be warlike, greedy, racist, selfish and vain and still believe that is one’s ‘personal Savior.’ The world has no time for such silliness anymore. The suffering on earth is too great.’”

BENEDICTION: Let us go out from this place in the sure knowledge that God is at the center of our lives. Let us go out from this place in the sure knowledge that God’s love abounds. Let us go out from this place and strive to have our deeds bear witness to God’s love. And may the steadfast love of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

[1] This document can be found here:
https://www.oikoumene.org/en/resources/documents/commissions/faith-and-order/i-unity-the-church-and-its-mission/baptism-eucharist-and-ministry-faith-and-order-paper-no-111-the-lima-text

05/05/2019 ~ Third Sunday of Easter ~ *Acts 9:1-6, (7-20); Psalm 30; Revelation 5:11-14; John 21:1-19 ~ *During Eastertide a reading from Acts is often substituted for the lesson from the Hebrew Bible ~ Communion Sunday.

Fear and the Call of God

“But Ananias protested, ‘I have heard from many sources about Saul and how much harm this Rabbi has done to your holy people in Jerusalem. Saul now is here and has authorization from the chief priests to arrest everybody who calls on Your name.’” — Acts 9:13-14.

If you have not heard about this, Bonnie and I have had a hectic week— even two weeks. First, I’ll list the church related hectic. I had an interment and two celebrations of life, commonly called funerals. This was Newsletter week— always hectic— a breakfast meeting earlier in the week and, of course, there was the usual— services had to be planned and sermons written.

And this week Bonnie had the New York Conference Women’s Retreat at Watson Homestead. I’ve heard very good reports about that from all those who went. I suppose it will not surprise you to hear she has become the official photographer of the Conference Women’s retreat. In fact next year when we intend to be living in the great State of Maine, the group is insisting they want her back.

Speaking of the great State of Maine, as we head toward retirement— or is it as we hurtle toward retirement— that is the other thing that made these two weeks hectic. We went to Maine… twice. The first trip, when we were house hunting, was planned. But currently there is not a lot of inventory so nothing came of that trip.

But on Monday morning last at about 8:00 a.m., a house was put on <realtor.com> which looked like it might be right for us. By 10:00 a.m. I was on the phone with our realtor. The entry said bids on the house were closing on Friday. Bids on a house closing in five days— that ought to give you an idea about how hot the housing market is where we are trying to go.

Early Tuesday morning the realtor did a FACETIME with us from the property. While that gave us a feel for what it was like, it was decided we really needed to see the place. And so Tuesday at about 12:30 we were off to Maine, our second trip in two weeks. As I said, the first one was planed; this one… not so much.

We got to Brunswick Tuesday evening at about 8:15 p.m— meaning we made really good time on the highway— had dinner and settled into a room at the Fairfield Inn. We were at a hotel because there had not been enough time to contact friends and ask to stay with them as we had done on previous trips.

Wednesday morning at 8:25 a.m. we met the realtor and saw the place in the flesh. We got on the road back to Norwich by 9:15 a.m. It was good we saw the house in person. As we drove south we talked about it and realized the house was not right for us.

As effective as pictures on the web are once we were there, in the house, we knew for us something was not quite right with that property. I am not even sure I can tell you what that something was.

We again made good time on the return trip. That drive is often at least eight hours, usually closer to nine. We made it back by 4:45, a mere seven hours and forty-five minutes on the road.

I was glad we made it back since there was yet another church reason for being here Wednesday evening. At 6:30 the Interfaith Council presented a Chenango County Day of Prayer in front of the courthouse steps right outside this building. Having returned, I was able to participate.

In any case, let me offer this advice. Please do not try to go to Maine twice in two weeks. And please do not try to go to Maine and back in about 28 hours. It ain’t easy. It’s somewhere southwest of hectic.

That story brings me to a statement of fact. No— Bonnie and I do not have a place to call our own in Maine even though we started seriously looking in February.

This week I will probably begin to explore rental properties— the cat is always a problem when it comes to rental properties— I will start to explore rental properties since we are running out of time. And yes, this is not just hectic. This is becoming a little more like scary.

At least in general, we know where we want to be. We have not yet found out exactly where or exactly how we will get that done. (Slight pause.)

This is what we find in the work known as Luke/Acts in the section commonly labeled as Acts: “But Ananias protested, ‘I have heard from many sources about Saul and how much harm this Rabbi has done to your holy people in Jerusalem. Saul now is here and has authorization from the chief priests to arrest everybody who calls on Your name.’” (Slight pause.)

Clearly, the first part of this story we heard from Acts is about Saul. Now I have said this before but I’ll mention it again. Despite popular legends and despite what is depicted in a myriad of bad Renaissance paintings which picture this conversion episode, Saul is not knocked off a horse of any kind. That is not in the text.

Saul simply falls to the ground. And, given what is written, I think we can safely state Saul is overwhelmed, even fearful.

That having been said, it is not the story of Saul which recently caught my attention. I suddenly noticed the story of Ananias had parallels to what happened to Saul. Yes, Saul is overwhelmed, frightened. But so is the faithful servant Ananias.

Indeed, let me translate what Ananias says into Twenty-first Century English for you. “Yo! God! You want me to do what?” Ananias is afraid and rightfully so.

We have been given all the information about Ananias we need to help us understand why this disciple is frightened. First, the Christ does not just appear to Saul. Christ also appears to Ananias. I think we tend to overlook that fact.

Second, even if only by reputation Ananias clearly knows who Saul is. Therefore, Ananias has every reason to be frightened. Think about it: Christ, who Ananias knows has been murdered by the State, appears.

Next, Ananias is told by Christ to go and heal someone who is arresting followers of Jesus. To be clear, what arresting means in this context is the people are being handed over by the temple authorities to the state, the Roman authorities, for punishment. That’s the way that worked. Ananias had every reason to be scared. (Slight pause.)

Let me invite you to consider something. If we are serious about life, when we stop and think about life, at times life is hectic. I take it back. Life is always hectic.

And yes, at times life is a little more than scary. We really don’t know what will happen tomorrow. But should that stop us from acting? (Slight pause.)

Let me invite you to consider something else. Is each of us, are all of us called by God? (Slight pause.) In her Christian Education article in the Newsletter this month Linda Oehme states the disciples were transformed from fearful people who met secretly behind closed doors into preachers and teachers.

Now, you might insist the disciples were empowered by the Holy Spirit— you know— Pentecost and all that stuff? But what makes you think we are not empowered by the Holy Spirit? Are we a post Pentecost people or are we not? (Slight pause.)

Let me come back to a personal note. One of the times we were recently in Maine a friend said it amazed him that I— and therefore we since it includes Bonnie— it amazed him that I said was headed to seminary and going into ordained ministry.

And then it happened. We followed through, made it happen. No, said I, we did not make it happen, at least not with that amount of exactness and certainty. We simply tried to be open to the call of God.

Please notice, I did not say I was sure that with any precision this was a call from God. I said I was open to the call of God. Hence, was this journey frightening? Why yes it was.

Was this journey which brought us here twenty-three ago frightening? Why yes it was.

And will our move to Maine be frightening? Why yes it will. But should that stop us from acting? (Slight pause.)

I think being open to the call of God is the key. I think that is what we see in Ananias— an openness.

And so, even if Bonnie and I wind up renting for a time when we move to Maine, we shall move because I already know I need to be open to the call of God. How can I be so sure I am being open to the call God?

Well, sure I’m not. But I do already know this. I will be peaching, filling a pulpit four times in Harpswell, Maine starting in August for a pastor who on sabbatical. And I really do not want to travel back and forth from here to Maine just to preach on those Sundays.

So really all I am trying to do (I think) is to be open. Open to what? Trying to be open to the will of God and then to act.

Where will those actions take me? I do not know. And yes, that is frightening. But neither did Ananias know. And yes, that was frightening. But acting is, I think, the key.

And, from what I hear that’s what this church, this congregation will strive to do once I am ensconced in Maine— just like Ananias you will strive to be open to the call of God and act. Amen.

United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York
05/045/2019

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Pastor Brian McLaren had said this (quote:) ‘The church is not about meeting your needs; the church is about joining the people of God to meet the needs of the world.’ Let me put that another way. The church is about action. I believe when we act we are better attuned to hearing the call of God then when we pretend we’re a rock and do nothing.”

BENEDICTION: Let us go where God leads us, for surely God leads us to embrace our neighbor with love. Let us follow where Christ has gone, and see the great commandment of loving God and loving neighbor as a watchword. And may the steadfast love of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the knowledge, companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

04/28/2019 ~ Second Sunday of Easter ~ *Acts 5:27-32; Psalm 118:14-29 or Psalm 150; Revelation 1:4-8; John 20:19-31 ~ *During Eastertide a reading from Acts is often substituted for the lesson from the Hebrew Bible ~ Blessing of the Quilts Ceremony.

Alpha and Omega

“‘I am the Alpha and the Omega,’ says our God ‘Who is and Who was and Who is to come, the Sovereign.’” — Revelation 1:8.

I know a United Church of Christ pastor, a friend, who is brilliant. This is what I mean by brilliant: when he reads Scripture privately, for himself, he reads it in the original languages. He also reads ancient religious literature— the so called church mothers and fathers— in the original languages.

Interestingly, he was raised in a family of fundamentalists. He was, himself, attending a fundamentalist seminary before being bitten by the liberal bug. Having been infected by liberality, he then got yet another degree at Harvard.

But back when he was in that fundamentalism seminary, being a fellow of brilliance, he began looking at the history of biblical manuscripts and also looked at ancient manuscripts in the original languages. Among the things he realized is there are often hundreds of manuscripts which contain the same passage.

Further, you can look at these passages, compare one manuscript to the next to the next. And none of these manuscripts— not one— exactly match the other in what’s written. Not one is exactly, word for word, the same.

Hence, it occurred to him that seeking a literal interpretation of Scripture seemed a pretty far fetched concept. After all, which manuscript should be taken as the one from which that aforementioned literal reading could be gleaned? And so, while at that fundamentalist seminary, he went to a professor and because of this obvious fact, asked how could Scripture be given a literal interpretation.

The professor had an interesting but unsatisfying answer. The professor said the original manuscript and only the original manuscript is what should be granted the ability of being taken in a literal way.

When my friend suggested to the professor no definitive original manuscripts could be identified. Then the professor nodded and said, “yes?” That was his only response. As I indicated, that was not a satisfying answer. (Slight pause.)

If you get an account on Facebook when you fill out your profile information it gives you an opportunity to claim some kind of religious belief. This is what I entered on my profile. I am a Trinitarian Monotheist or a Monotheistic Trinitarian.

Given that entry, I don’t know if the joke I am about to offer will be funny only if you went to seminary but I have always found it hysterically funny. The joke runs like this: there is one question and only one question on the final exam in a Christian Theology class. Define God; give three examples.

I, of course, find that funny since, as a final exam in a Christian Theology class it is an invitation to address the basic Christian belief we label as the Trinity. And I heard laughs so you get it. Trinity— define God; give three examples— all right.

Needless to say, the basis of Christianity is the Trinity. It is what separates Christians from many other traditions. But can we, mere humans, actually define God? (Slight pause.)

So, here’s another challenge similar to the ‘define God, give three examples challenge.’ Define Scripture. (Slight pause.)

Here is my definition: Scripture is an example of the inadequacy of our language. Scripture is an example of our inability to define God, to explain God.

Let me put that another way: words are not reality. Words are only an inadequate reflection of reality. (Slight pause.)

We hear this, these words, in the work known as Revelation: “‘I am the Alpha and the Omega,’ says our God ‘Who is and Who was and Who is to come, the Sovereign.’” (Slight pause.)

Throughout this reading the author describes God, Jesus and the Spirit. These descriptions have parallels in a variety of Jewish and non-Jewish sources and, therefore, would have sounded familiar tones, familiar notes in New Testament times.

Needless to say, this passage is being read today in the season of Eastertide, the celebration of the resurrection. We read this now in part because what emerges with particular clarity in the words is a richness of an understanding of the role of Jesus.

Christ is described in terms of the work of the ministry preformed. Christ is described in terms of the role as a witness of and for God. Christ is described in terms of the present and even future accomplishments of the resurrection. Hence, we also have a description of and for the presence among us of the Spirit.

But it is the closing— that Alpha and Omega, that wording— which catches my attention and perhaps our attention. These words are attributed to God and place the whole reading in context.

This is God who breathes the first word, the action by which creation came into being. This is God who has and will have the last word, the action by which a new creation will come into being. That ultimate action illuminates and is illuminated by the promise of Easter, by the resurrection.

This description catches our attention because, while these are mere words, merely a description of God, they speak about action— action taken by God— the action of creation and the action of new creation. What I take away from that is simple.

While words themselves are static, mere descriptions, action is not static. Indeed, what I take away from this is, if God is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, then these words are merely an attempt at describing a God of action, a God Who calls us not through words or with words but calls us to action, the reality of action. Put another way, this uses inadequate language in an attempt to describe the reality of action— the reality of action by God whose very being is illuminated by and through action. (Slight pause.)

In a couple minutes we shall dedicate, bless the quilts made by the Chenango Piecemakers quilt group. As was said earlier the quilts will be given away. As was said earlier, this is a ministry of love.

I want to suggest what the Piecemakers do is not simply about making quilts. This is about taking action, the reality of action. And the very action being taken is an action because the action expresses love.

Indeed, we often describe love as a feeling. I think that is, at best, a poor description. When love is real, love is not only or simply a feeling. Love is action. And since real love is action, love always defies our ability to fully describe it.

All that brings us back to God who is Alpha and Omega, beginning and end. How can we describe God? We cannot describe God. Mere language is not up to the task of describing God.

But we can, I think, engage God, interact with God. How? We engage God, interact with God when our own actions can be described as loving, when we act in love, when we act with love.

That’s what our friends, the Piecemakers do. They take action to express love. That love displays its reality in the action of making quilts. So let us do something similar. Let us express our love not in mere words but in the reality of action. Amen.

United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York
04/28/2019

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Two things: at Christmastide this church displays a giant Alpha and Omega in this worship space, a recognition that the incarnation and the resurrection are irrevocably tied actions. Second, let me leave you with a quote from Thomas Merton. ‘In a world so torn apart by rivalry and anger we have the privileged vocation of being living signs of a love that can bridge all divisions and heal all wounds.’ I would suggest that healing is possible but never through inaction. Healing is possible only through action.”

BENEDICTION: Go out in the compassion and love God provides. Praise the deeds of God by the way you live. And may the steadfast love of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

04/21/2019 ~ Resurrection of the Christ ~ Easter Day ~ *Acts 10:34-43 or Isaiah 25:6-9; Psalm 118:1-2, 14-24; 1 Corinthians 15:1-11 or Acts 10:34-43; John 20:1-18 or
Mark 16:1-8. Used: 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 [ILV], John 20:1-18.

Trusting Truth

“These words seemed to those who listened to be an idle tale, nonsensical, and they refused to believe. Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. Upon getting there this apostle stooped and looked in but could see nothing but the linen cloths, the wrappings, on the ground.” — Luke 24:11-12.

If nothing else, he was… methodical. If nothing else, he was… careful. If nothing else, he looked at every piece of evidence available and… examined it.

Peter simply sought truth. That was Peter, all right— methodical, careful, seeker of truth.

And so Peter’s tendency was to listen. Peter listened with care. Peter examined everything these women said.

And Peter knew these women well. They had been through a lot together.

They had traveled with the Rabbi all over the Roman Provence of Judea. Indeed, they were there, together, when the Rabbi spoke to a large crowd on a plain, when the Rabbi spoke about the poor, the hungry, the excluded being blessed.

They were there, together, when the Rabbi spoke about loving one’s enemies, not being judgmental, about forgiveness, there when that large crowd got fed. They were there, together, when a healing happened to the Centurion’s daughter— the Centurion’s daughter— a Gentile woman!

They were there, together, when the Rabbi spoke about not hiding light, spoke about letting light shine. Indeed, it seemed to all of them the Rabbi often spoke about light, never about night.

And yet… and yet… they were all there that short time ago when night seemed to envelop them. They were all there when the Rabbi was executed, an enemy of the State, murdered by the State, murdered by… Rome.

And so Peter, by the nature of that relationship, that common experience, that bond with these women, trusted them as tellers of the truth. Peter trusted what these women said about that morning— that they had gone to the tomb— trusted what they said they found there, trusted that as… truth. But that was also when Peter decided he had to go to the tomb.

After all, Peter was Peter. Peter needed to look at every piece of evidence available and… examine. Peter had to seek… truth.

So alone, he set off to the tomb and ran part of the way. But he was no longer twenty. After a bit, the pace got slower.

In an odd way Peter was grateful for that. The time walking allowed him to once again think about what he had heard, what he had experienced. Peter remembered the time the Rabbi sent out the seventy with nothing, no purse, no bag, no sandals.

They returned filled with joy. The Rabbi said the Spirit of God had been with them. Peter realized what the Rabbi was teaching them: trust God above all else.

And then… and then… Peter remembered that time John and James and Peter all accompanied the Rabbi, went up the mountain to pray. And they prayed.

And all of them, together, had a vision. Peter remembered there was light. Peter remember feeling a sense of peace.

Peter remembered he felt the presence of God, the embrace of God, the arms of God surround him. But what did that vision, that light, that sense of peace, that presence, that embrace, say about the Rabbi, say about God? (Slight pause.)

Peter reached the tomb and reminded himself to be methodical, careful. This apostle stooped and looked in. (Slight pause.)

There was nothing to see except exactly what the women had said would be seen— linen cloths, wrappings, on the ground. (Slight pause.) Peter stood up, took a breath, then another.

Despite being alone, out loud he asked, “What do I really know? What are the facts?” Peter was Peter.

Peter had seen the blood of the Rabbi. It was real. Peter knew his friend, the Rabbi, had been executed. Peter took yet another a deep breath and sat on a nearby stone.

Of course, Peter knew the Rabbi spoke about the poor, the hungry, the excluded being blessed, about loving one’s enemies, about not being judgmental, about forgiveness, about light, about the Spirit of God. But Peter also knew the Rabbi taught them over and over and over again to trust God.

Perhaps Peter was unnerved by the reality of it all, the memories of time spent with the Rabbi, the reality of the execution, the reality of an empty tomb. His body began to quake. Peter sobbed.

Tears streamed down his face, his beard. He wept and wept and wept, his head in his hands. (Long pause.) Suddenly Peter knew, experienced, an overwhelming sense of peace of God, the presence of God, the embrace of God, the arms of God. Peter knew the Rabbi, Jesus, was there with him. Peter felt someone touch him, tap him on the shoulder.

Peter opened his eyes and looked up. There was no one near him, touching him. Peter stopped weeping, wiped the tears away. He had realized something he knew all along.

Peter realized that over and over and over again this Rabbi, this Jesus offered a singular message. Trust God— trust that the peace of God, the presence of God, is with us always. Trust that God walks with us, no matter what.

Peter realized this is precisely what the Rabbi, this Jesus had done— trust God. Even when being murdered by the State, murdered by Rome the Rabbi, this Jesus trusted God. (Slight pause.) Peter— Peter who was methodical, careful, Peter who constantly examined things, Peter who sought the truth— Peter realized trust in God mattered. Peter realized trusting God means seeking truth— God’s truth.

And what is God’s truth? Peter knew what Jesus taught. Jesus taught God’s truth consists of peace, justice, hope, light, freedom, joy, love.

Peter realized this Rabbi, this Jesus, embodied the truth of God. Peter realized the truth of God and only the truth of God reflects this reality.

It was at that point Peter— methodical, careful, Peter, Peter who always sought truth, knew there was only one course to follow… trust— simply trust God. And after all, Peter knew, Peter could feel the presence of Christ, there next to him, there, as he sat on that rock.

And Peter did trust this truth: Jesus was not in the tomb. Jesus was present, alive, resurrected. Christ had risen. (Slight pause.) Amen.

04/21/2019 – Easter Sunday -10:00 A.M. Service
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I need to say two things: first, in Aramaic, which would have been spoken in Roman Judea in New Testament times, to be saved meant to be made alive. Second, I want to suggest to merely say ‘Happy Easter’ is not a Christian sentiment. So, let me make a suggestion: if someone walks up to you today and says, ‘Happy Easter’ smile and say, ‘Christ is risen.’ ‘Christ is risen’ is the Christian sentiment.”

BENEDICTION: Hear now this blessing and then please join with me in the responsive Easter acclamation found in the bulletin— May the peace of God, which passes all understanding, keep your hearts and minds in the love of Christ, Jesus, and in the knowledge of the Holy Spirit this day and forever.
And please join with me in the Easter Acclamation.
ONE: Rejoice, people of God! Christ is risen from the dead! Go in peace to love and serve God. Christ is with you always. Alleluia! Christ is Risen!
MANY: Christ is risen, indeed. Alleluia!

03/31/2019 ~ Fourth Sunday in Lent ~ Joshua 5:9-12; Psalm 32; 2 Corinthians 5:16-21; Luke 15:1-3, 11b-32.

Supernatural

“From now on, therefore, we regard no one from what might be called a human point of view, mere human judgment. Even if we did once regard Christ in these terms, that is not how we know Christ now.” — 2 Corinthians 5:16.

Last week I started off my comments with these words: “Many of you know this. I’ve probably said it hundreds of times.” I then referred to being a proud graduate of Bangor Theological Seminary.

What I want to say this week you have also heard me say probably hundreds of times. The faith tradition of my youth was Roman Catholic.

My first 10 years of schooling— First Grade through Sophomore year in High School— were all spent in parochial schools, Catholic Schools. The first six years of that schooling were in the same grade school, one connected with the local parish church my family attended.

It’s the name of the parish church, hence, it’s the name of the grade school, I want to mention. The church, the grade school, had what many would see as a horrible even somewhat frightening name: Fourteen Holy Martyrs— Fourteen Holy Martyrs grade school, Fourteen Holy Martyrs church.

Goggle that name— Fourteen Holy Martyrs— and the church and school show up. This group of saints, a grouping which dates from the 14th century in the Rhineland, was just that— a grouping.

These saints did not live in the 14th Century. This grouping of saints were not even alive at the same time. All of them also, by far, predated the 14th Century but got grouped together in that era.

They were grouped together and venerated because people were encouraged to pray for the intercession of these saints with God. The influence of that intercession was believed to be effective in multiple forms of healing. And the healing being sought in the 14th Century was quite specific: healing from bubonic plague, the Black Death.

Now, when you look up these 14 saints what you find out is in Germany, in the Rhineland, they were not known as Fourteen Holy Martyrs. They were called Fourteen Holy Helpers.

And each of them were connected to a specific healing, each saint connected to a different healing— fever, diseases of the eye, etc, etc. In short, in terms of Catholic tradition, the intercession of these saints on behalf of people helped cure various diseases. I suppose since the bubonic plague was so horrific, any kind of healing would do.

That having been said, one does have to wonder what in the American psyche translated the name of these fourteen saints from “Helpers” to “Martyrs.” This is especially true since, in the legends of these saints— and these saints are not particularly traceable to real people but were legends— in the legends of these saints none of them appear to have actually suffered a martyr’s death.

To be clear, I labeled that Fourteen Holy Martyrs name as horrible since I sometimes still wonder what kind of effect a name like that had on impressionable youngsters attending a grade school thusly named. Did that name somehow traumatize them for life? Did that name mean some of the students might think that they, themselves, were also headed for martyrdom?

Some probably did think that. Not I. If one takes theology seriously one does not indulge in that kind of transference and early on I already took theology seriously.

I make that statement about taking theology seriously because what I am about to say happened when I was in the Fourth Grade, or at least that’s what my memory says. Even if that memory is slightly inaccurate, I know it happened when I was still attending Fourteen Holy Martyrs since I also know in the Seventh Grade I switched schools and started to attend Saint Ignatius Loyola Grade School. So this happened no later than the Sixth Grade; I think earlier.

In any case, around that point in time I got into a deep theological discussion with my parents. I stated the premise that the grace of God is not natural, not normal. The grace of God is outside what is natural, outside of what is normal.

Further, that the grace of God is, itself, a gift from God is not normal either. Why” Grace is a free gift and there is nothing normal about a free gift. So if the grace of God is not natural it is, thereby… supernatural. Natural is what we humans do; supernatural is the work of God, said I. (Slight pause.)

We find these words in the work known as Second Corinthians: “From now on, therefore, we regard no one from what might be called a human point of view, mere human judgment. Even if we did once regard Christ in these terms, that is not how we know Christ now.” (Slight pause.)

In the Roman Catholic tradition two kinds of grace are identified— Actual Grace and Sanctifying Grace. I won’t get into the differences here. Neither I nor you have that kind of time today.

So, let’s get right to the point. What is grace? The Roman definition, that is the Roman Catholic definition says grace is the supernatural help of God granted in and through the reality of the Christ. [1]

This is not to say the grace of God only happened after the birth of Christ. The grace of God can be found all over Scripture.

Indeed, the Roman church, itself, says the grace of God was available before Christ. God is, after all, God. Rule one— do not put God in a box. Rule 2— see rule one: do not put God in a box.

But that very thought— not placing God in a box— brings us to Paul’s writing. Something common in all the lectionary readings assigned for today, but especially in the Corinthians and in the parables found in Luke, is that joy is available in the restorative love of God.

I need to be clear: joy is not happiness. We get happiness from having fun or doing something we like. Joy is found only in deep, lasting, full relationships, especially a deep, lasting, full relationship with God.

The reality of that joy happens because the Christ has opened up a new way of knowing, says Paul. The Christ has opened up a new way to see a new world.

Further, in the Christ the reconciling love of God is clearly revealed. And then Paul pushes this idea still one more step.

Paul’s claim is that because of the grace of God we— we— are commissioned to be engaged in the ministry of reconciliation, ambassadors for God in the ministry of reconciliation. This is not natural. This not what humans do normally. This is supernatural. (Slight pause.)

One of my commentaries on this reading says (quote:) “Nothing may be more difficult for Christians in North America than adopting the new way of discernment inherent in the gospel.” Why? (Quote:) “To be reconciled to God means to be an agent of reconciliation… for the world.”

Please note: the words from this commentary were not ripped from recent headlines. This commentary is many, many years old. (Slight pause.)

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, an anti-Nazi dissident. The writings of Bonhoeffer on the role of Christianity have become widely influential.

The book The Cost of Discipleship has been described as a modern classic. Bonhoeffer died in a Nazi concentration camp on April 9, 1945, just before the end of WWII. Hence, Bonhoeffer was a martyr, a martyr of the Christian faith.

In a sermon on Second Corinthians Bonhoeffer said this (quote:) “Christendom adjusts itself far too easily to the worship of power. Christians should give more offense, shock the world far more than they are doing now. Christians should take a stronger stand in favor of the weak rather than considering first the possible right of the strong.” (Slight pause.)

What was Bonhoeffer getting at? What was Paul getting at? I may be wrong but I think they are getting at… the supernatural.  (Quote:) “…through Christ, the world was fully reconciled to God, who did not hold our transgressions against us— who did not hold our transgressions against us— but instead entrusted us with this message of reconciliation.”

If that does not turn the world as we know it upside down, I do not know what does. That is not natural. That is supernatural.

For we humans that we are empowered by God, entrusted by God to be a part of reconciliation is supernatural. It is a gift of God, the work of God. Question: are we willing to participate in the work God sets before us? Amen.

03/31/2019
United Church of Christ, Norwich, NY

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “This saying has been going around. I think it applies. ‘Our job is not to judge others. Our job is not to figure out if someone is deserving of something. Our job is to lift those who are fallen. Our job is to restore those who are broken. Our job is to heal those who are hurting.’ Simply striving to do that it is supernatural and will, by the power of acting in that way, turn the world as we know it upside down. Here’s another way to put it. As theologians we need to understand theology is not a hammer. Hammers are only good at hitting nails. Our theology is not a hammer. Our theology needs to be glue which mends the world and holds it together.”

BENEDICTION: Let us seek to love as we have been loved by God, welcoming our brothers and sisters. Let us rejoice in God’s goodness and steadfast love. Let us follow where God leads. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the steadfast love of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

[1] http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06689x.htm

READINGS: 03/24/2019 ~ Third Sunday in Lent ~ Isaiah 55:1-9; Psalm 63:1-8; 1 Corinthians 10:1-13; Luke 13:1-9 ~ Note: 1 Corinthians 1:18-28 Added.

Radical Christianity

“…the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” — 1 Corinthians 1:18.

Many of you know this. I’ve probably said it hundreds of times. I am a proud graduate of Bangor Theological Seminary, Bangor, Maine. I have often said one of the very positive things about attending Bangor Theological Seminary was, before I was called to the be the Associate at a five church cooperative in Waldo County, Maine, I got a chance to do a lot of preaching.

The reason I got that chance is twofold. First, I a took a course in preaching which qualified me to be on a list of supply preachers kept by the Seminary. Second, Bangor Seminary, the city of Bangor itself, is in a rural area of a rural state.

Therefore, especially in Northern Maine, there are many, many small churches in many, many tiny rural towns— crossroads really— churches which accessed the Seminary preaching supply list. They relied on Seminary students for Sunday fill-in when necessary. Some of those churches used only that supply list Sunday to Sunday.

Hence, in the two years before I accepted the call to the Waldo County Cooperative— 104 Sundays— I preached 47 times in 23 locations. Obviously, 47 Sundays is nearly half the number of Sundays in the course of those two years. And that this supply work happened in 23 locations tells you I was called back to the same churches a lot. (Slight pause.)

So, have you ever been to Aroostook County, Maine? Aroostook is the largest county by area east of the Rocky Mountains. And early one Sunday morning Bonnie and I were on a long drive headed north to a church up in “The County” as it is known locally. I had a supply assignment.

She was driving and I was reading a text book. It was a theology text book. I had an exam the next day. Have you ever read a theology text book?

If you think the writing of Paul is dense, you have never read a current theology text book. One paragraph struck me as being particularly dense. So I turned to Bonnie and said, “Let me read this paragraph for you and please tell me if you understand what the author is getting at.”

And I did— I read it out loud to Bonnie. And when I had read it to myself or when I read it out loud for Bonnie to hear, she was not and I was not able to understand what the author was getting at. And indeed, whether we are talking about the Apostle Paul writing on theology two millennia ago or a current writer of theology, theology is, by its nature, is dense, hard to understand, hard to comprehend.

I was reminded of that incident of reading a paragraph to Bonnie a couple of weeks ago when I was mentoring a young pastor. That pastor told me Seminary taught them it was their duty to preach the Gospel. I took exception to that statement.

The work of a pastor, said I, is not just preach the Gospel but to help people understand the Gospel. If it’s your duty to preach the Gospel and no one understands what you say, that’s not going to help them or you. (Slight pause.)

I would be the first to say sometimes I am successful at helping people understand the Gospel, sometimes not so much. I also would be the first to say helping people understand the Gospel is something I try to learn and to do afresh every week. (Slight pause.)

And these are words found in the work known as First Corinthians: “…the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” (Slight pause.)

Well this is evident: Paul has a message to convey. (Quote:) “…the message about the cross…” But how are we to understand Paul’s message about the cross these two millennia later?

Perhaps we need to ask ‘what was Paul’s message?’ Was it as radical as Paul seems to be claiming in this passage— (quote:) “Has not God turned the wisdom of this world into folly?”

Indeed, how radical is Christianity? Our resident theologian, the one who makes things sound so complex, is the Apostle Paul. And certainly, what is clear amidst the complexity is this: a central topic in this passage is salvation.

But what did salvation mean to Paul? This seems to be evident: salvation meant one is saved from the powers which destroy— the powers which destroy— that’s commonly referred to as sin— one is saved from the powers which destroy and the consequences of the powers which destroy.

Now, there is something we need to remember here, something I have said numerous times. The earliest followers of Jesus were Jews. Paul was a Jew. Jesus was a Jew.

What was salvation for the Jews? For Jews salvation refers to the redeeming action of God in saving the people of Israel from their various exiles.

However, that salvation is not limited to the ancient exiles of Israel. Salvation also includes the present exile— an exile from God. Hence, coming back to that thing so many call sin, one is saved from the powers which destroy… now.

One is saved from this exile, an exile from God not in some afterlife but now, right now. (Slight pause.)

I know: all that sounds like theology. It teeters toward the complex, not easy to understand. So let me try to untangle that just a little. (Slight pause.)

Is the love of God absolute and unconditional? There are obviously different ways to speak of divine love but salvation always comes down to that question: ‘is the love of God absolute and unconditional?’

A plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is unconditional. Equally a plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is limited, conditional. But the important question is not the biblical texts we cite.

The important question is ‘which texts are to be given priority?’ So, within the expanse of Biblical revelation we have to ask what vision governs our reading of Scripture?

If we believe the love God offers is conditional, limited, then we’ll read Scripture one way. If we believe the love God offers is unconditional, unlimited, then we’ll read Scripture another way.

So the question here is not the texts or how many we cite to support one position or the other. That is simply not relevant because there is an obvious logical, to say nothing of theological, problem with claiming the love of God is wrapped up in conditions.

The problem is to read the texts in a transactional way turns God into a broker, a salesperson, a banker, an divine entity who makes deals. Conditions do not address love. Conditions turn love into a mere transaction.

Therefore one simple question needs to be asked: is God the very God we Christians claim God to be? Or should God be described as a divinity who deals in reward and punishment? Here’s another way to put it: is God that radical, so radical that God loves unconditionally? (Slight pause.)

Let me tell you who often deals in the kind of transactions we think of as reward and punishment. Let me tell you who often deals in brokering.

That would be us— homo sapiens, humans. Do we want God to be God— or do we want God to be human, just like us?

You do know the old joke line: God created us in God’s own image and we returned the favor. We need to stop returning that favor. We need to stop turning God into us.

And, if truth be told, we humans are transactional. We too often deal in a kind of love which can only be labeled as transactional. There is no doubt about this: we humans make all kinds of deals around relationship.

And I think, at least in part, that’s Paul’s point. God is so radical that, when it comes to love, God does not deal in transactions.

And yes, that is hard for we humans to understand. But I hope I helped a little with some understanding in these last minutes. If I didn’t I apologize and I shall give it another try next week.

That having been said, I don’t care how complex Paul or any other theologian is. It really all comes down to just this: God loves us. God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.

Are we ready to accept a God Who is that radical? Are we ready to accept a Christianity which is that radical? Amen.

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “A couple minutes ago I said ‘God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.’ That can be labeled as covenant love. And it is a radical idea. God also wants us to be in covenant with one another. That can also be called covenant love. And that can also be labeled as a radical idea. So, this is the bottom line about theology: it doesn’t have to be as complex as we make it out to be— talk about a radical idea— because it is this simple: love God; love neighbor. And let’s check in with that radical idea once I awhile and try to keep it as un-transactional as possible.”

BENEDICTION: God’s steadfast love endures forever. Let us live our days offering thanks to God who feeds our souls. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

READINGS: 03/17/2019 ~ Second Sunday in Lent ~ Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18; Psalm 27; Philippians 3:17-4:1; Luke 13:31-35 or Luke 9:28-36, (37-43a) ~ Note: Saint Patrick’s Day.

Covenant Made

“On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram…” — Genesis 15:18.

It happens all the time. People enter our lives. Then we move on or they move on and in a sense we forget them. But do we?

I was recently reminded twice in one week of someone who was in my life 40 years ago. And I was reminded of this person because of conversations I had with two friends at two different times. Things they said brought this person to mind.

Why did that happen? I don’t know. But when, for whatever reason, something like that does happen my sense is I’m supposed to pay attention.

This person’s name was Caterina Jarboro. She was an African-American classical singer. She died in 1986 at the age of 90.

I looked up her obituary in the New York Times to see if the facts stated there jibed with my memory. [1] Generally they did. But I have more detail from the stories she told me then the Times offered, so let me share some recollections.

I met Caterina when I was working with the Actor’s Fund of America. She was a volunteer. Some of what she told me refers to often forgotten theater history and some of what she said concerns American history many of us know about. So I hope as I tell you about Caterina to make these references clear. (Slight pause)

Despite being a classically trained singer, an opera singer, Caterina worked on Broadway. She was in the original 1921 Broadway production of Shuffle Along. It was the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans.

Many theater professionals were skeptical a black-written show would appeal to Broadway audiences. But it ran for 504 performances and earned $9 million, a long run and a large sum for its time.

The book writers were names you’ve probably never heard, Flournoy Miller and Aubrey Lyles. The best known song in Shuffle Along was I’m Just Wild about Harry. The writers of all the songs in the show were Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake. [2]

Of those four writers— Miller, Lyles, Sissle and Blake— Blake gained the most notoriety. Besides I’m Just Wild about Harry the songs In Honeysuckle Time and Memories of You were among his hits. In 1981 he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Ronald Reagan.

Back to Caterina— now that I’ve mentioned her Broadway work I’ll move on to opera. She made her United States opera debut in Verdi’s Aida in a 1933 Summer Opera series at the Hippodrome, a very large New York City Theater. It was the first time a black woman had the lead role in an all-white opera company in America.

Both before and after that appearance she toured for a number of seasons in Europe. Needless to say she returned to the States as WWII started. After returning she had recitals at Town Hall and Carnegie Hall.

Caterina once told me this story: upon her return to America in 1941 she approached an agent to see if she could get a tour started stateside. Of course, the well known African-American classical singer in that era was Marian Anderson.

In 1939 the Daughters of the American Revolution refused to allow Anderson to sing in Constitution Hall for an integrated audience. So Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt arranged for Anderson to perform on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. A crowd of 75,000 gathered for that and there was a radio audience of millions.

Caterina was told by that agent she approached there was room for only one black female classical singer in America and currently that singer was Marion Anderson. So no, there would be no room for Caterina Jarboro or a Caterina Jarboro tour. One black classical singer in America was enough, thank you. (Slight pause.)

Caterina taught me a lot by her attitude, by how she approached her volunteer work at the Actors Fund. She was precise. She was dedicated. She was faithful. And her story, her many stories, spoke volumes to me.

And yes, she was extraordinarily talented. And yes, because of the world in which she lived, the era in which she lived, she was never able receive the acclaim she deserved. That must have been excruciatingly hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.

But she persisted. In a way she was relentless. She never surrendered, never gave up. She always moved forward with a steady, sure hand.

Because the world is what it is she knew there would be roadblocks. But she also knew there was work to be done. And she was someone who could be trusted, someone who could be counted on to do what she could. (Long pause.)

These words are in Genesis: “On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram…” (Slight pause.)

I want you to notice several things about this reading. Abram gathers a heifer, a goat, a ram, a turtledove and a young pigeon. Abram even cuts the larger animals in two.

The darkness, the smoking barrier, the fire pot, the flaming torch we hear about are images fraught with the symbolism of covenant making in the Ancient Near East. Hence, they are not meant as mysterious. That these are symbols of covenant making would have been clear to those who first read these words.

Now, when God says words that give the land (quote:) “to your descendants,” therefore when the covenant, itself, is established, when God enacts the covenant, itself, Abram is (quote:) “in a deep trance.” Therefore Abram does nothing to establish the covenant, enact the covenant or respond to the covenant.

So there is no question about this. The covenant made by God with us is not a two way agreement. It is God Who makes the covenant with us.

The covenant God offers is, like grace, a free gift. God initiates this covenant. God enacts this covenant. God establishes the covenant. To use a phrase I used last week, God is the prime mover. The covenant is not of our doing

Further, what Abram has done is not covenant making. Abram participates. Abram participates by gathering and slaughtering the animals. So what has Abram really done? Abram trusted God.

So you might ask, if Abram has done nothing to initiate the covenant, to enact the covenant, to establish the covenant, where is our place in this covenant? What are we to do? I think the key is simple and sometimes hard deal with, hard to comprehend because we firmly believe we are in control of everything.

That having been said, let me ask a key question yet again, where is our place in this covenant? (Slight pause.) We are invited by God to participate— participate— in the covenant. And for us mere participation can be hard. It does not feel like enough. We want to do more. Perhaps we even want be in control. (Slight pause.)

I want to suggest there is something for us to do, something we can do. But it has nothing to do with control. It is about relinquishing control. We are to do what Abram did. We are called to trust God. (Slight pause.)

Let’s go back to the story of Caterina Jarboro. She was in Shuffle Along, the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans. She toured for a number of seasons in Europe.

She was the first black woman to have the lead role in an all-white opera company in America. But she was not able to receive the acclaim she deserved since there was room for only one Marian Anderson in America. And yes, that must have been hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.

And what was she doing when I met her? She was volunteering for The Actors Fund. In volunteering she was raising money to help those in her profession in need.

What was she really doing when I met her? She was persisting. She was being relentless. She had never surrendered, never given up.

She was always moving forward with a sure, steady hand. She knew there was more to life than roadblocks. She trusted that. (Slight pause.)

So, why was I reminded of Caterina twice in one week? Perhaps I was reminded so I could share her story. And perhaps I was reminded so I could note that our real part in the covenant is to trust God. And that, I think, not just our part in covenant. That is the real lesson of covenant: trust God.

Why? The world is what it is. Caterina knew that. The world now is not the way God would have it. Caterina knew that.

And we need to trust God so we can be empowered to do the work of God and the will of God. Doing the work of God and the will of God is the result of trusting God. Amen.

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Theologian Walter Brueggemann said this (quote:) ‘Covenant (and, therefore, true spirituality), consists of learning the skills and sensitivities that include both the courage to assert self and the grace to abandon self to another’ (unquote). In short, covenant is not possible unless you recognize the needs of others.’ The needs of others— it’s that love your neighbor thing we keep hearing about. And I would suggest to love your neighbor we actually need to trust God.”

BENEDICTION: Let our hearts take courage. Our God meets us where our needs rest. God is our shelter and shield. God’s blessings outnumber the stars. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/16/obituaries/caterina-jarboro.html

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuffle_Along

READINGS: 03/10/2019 ~ First Sunday in Lent ~ Deuteronomy 26:1-11; Psalm 91:1-2, 9-16; Romans 10:8b-13; Luke 4:1-13 ~ Service at Chenango Valley Home.

Near Occasions

“In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” — Luke 4:12

Sometimes you meet someone and you connect with that person immediately and you cannot ever quite understand why you have made that connection. On the other hand and on other occasions you can connect with someone and right away you fully understand that connection.

Back when I lived in New York City and was active in professional theater I made a connection, became a friend with someone, and it was easy to understand why we made an immediate connection. But the real reason we connected was not the obvious one. The obvious connection was theater— she was a dancer and actor, I was a writer. But there were also great differences between us and those differences were quite large.

I was, for instance, from New York City. She was from Omaha, Nebraska. Those are worlds apart.

Interestingly, the real connection was our schools and our schooling. We had both gone to a parochial grade school, a Catholic school, one of us in Omaha, one of us in New York City.

But it was not just that we had both attended a Catholic school. Both schools were staffed by the same order of teaching nuns— Dominicans, the order of Saint Dominic. This is an order well known for its outstanding teachers.

In claiming that having Dominican nuns as teachers was the significant connection, let me illustrate that with just one story and I think you’ll see what I mean. In instructing their charges about religion we both heard exactly the same thing concerning sin.

This is what was said: the responsibility of any individual was to try to avoid being a sinner. And how did one avoid being a sinner?

The individual had to keep away from what the nuns called the “near occasions of sin.” Here’s an example and it the one they used. In both Omaha and New York City might add they used the same example! If gambling on horses is a sin— and believe me, the nuns very much thought gambling on horses was a sin— if gambling on horses is a sin then one must never go to a racetrack.

After all, just being at a racetrack puts you physically in a place where the sin of gambling on horses was quite close. And when you are that close to gambling you might be tempted to gamble. A racetrack was, hence, a near occasion of sin. So stay away from racetracks since when you are at one sin sits there waiting to take possession of you.

These nuns had, I think, never spoken to my late grandfather. My grandfather had, himself, never actually been to a racetrack even though he lied about five miles from one. But, illegal though this practice was, he had his own personal bookie, a bookmaker, and he placed bets on the nags regularly.

My point is twofold. One reason my friend and I connected quickly is we had, essentially, the same grade school training, the same grade school experience, despite the fact that the locations where we spent our youth were half a continent away.

My second point has to do with today’s Gospel reading. You probably noticed in this reading Jesus encounters a bunch of near occasions of sin. So, is this reading about overcoming the near occasions of sin or is it about something else? (Slight pause.)

We hear this in the work commonly called Luke: “In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” (Slight pause.)

Perhaps a good place to start in thinking about this is by asking the obvious question: what is the Biblical definition of sin? The Biblical definition of sin is simple and straightforward.

Sin is breaking covenant. Therefore and hence, sin is anything imperfect. The last time I looked none of us are perfect. (If anyone here is perfect you can leave now.) So, in that sense we are all sinners.

But I want to suggest this reading is not about us nor is it about our transgressions, our sins, whatever they might be. This reading is about God. Therefore, a basic statement needs to be made.

We are not the ones who seek to be in covenant with God. God reaches out to us and seeks to be covenant with us. God is, to use the classic language, the prime mover.

Here’s a different way of saying that. God loves us. God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.

Therefore, the next obvious question becomes what should we do in response to the fact that God loves us? Indeed, given this is the season known as Lent, some people suggest we should give up something.

It is sometimes suggested we abstain from things. By the way, not fact from things; abstain from things. There’s a difference. Fact is like not eating for a long, long time. Abstain is not doing. O.K.? It’s suggested we should abstain from things, not have them.

Say, for instance, abstain from chocolate or ice cream. I think a lot of people are shaking their heads ‘no’ on that one, right? O.K. So, what we should do? Should we abstain?

I have a list of things from which we might abstain, that has been going around recently. It’s a couple of years old and it is attributed to Pope Francis.

Here it is: abstain from hurting words, words that hurt; say kind words. Abstain from sadness; be filled with gratitude. Abstain from anger; be filled with patience. Abstain from pessimism; be filled with hope. Abstain from worries; trust God.

Abstain from complaints; contemplate simplicity. Abstain from pressures; be prayerful. Abstain from bitterness; be joyful. Abstain from selfishness; be compassionate. Abstain from grudges; be reconciled; abstain from words; be silent, listen. (Slight pause.)

Did you notice this is actually a list of positives, things we can and should do rather than things we should not do, things from which we might really abstain like ice cream and chocolate. I am quite sure each of you could add something else to this list, something you could do.

For me, doing is central in keeping covenant with God. We need to search and find out what can we do to make things better. What can we do to make things better?

We need to find solutions rather than complain about problems. We need to discover what can we do to work toward the fulness of a covenant with God.

And that brings me back to what covenant is about. As I said earlier, “God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.” (Slight pause.)

On Wednesday last, Ash Wednesday, people and pastors from my church, the United Church of Christ, First Congregational, from Broad Street United Methodist Church, from Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church, from Emmanuel Episcopal Church and from the First Baptist Church— five churches— gathered together for an Ash Wednesday Service. Five churches we gathered as one in Christ. Now right there— that’s doing something.

Ashes were imposed. Ashes are not meant to be a symbol of the wrath of God or sorrow, though I am sure some take it that way. Rather ashes are a symbol of our mortality, our frailty, our imperfection.

Hence, they are also a symbol which says we need to do the work of God here, now in our time— doing! The work of God is about doing. The work of God is about the aforementioned kind words, gratitude, patience, hope, trust, simplicity, prayerfulness, joy, compassion, reconciliation, listening.

So perhaps what we need to ask during this season we call Lent is what can we do? Here’s my suggestion. We can strive to be in covenant with God.

The way I see it, being in covenant with God is at one and the same time amazingly easy and dreadfully hard. Being in covenant with God means loving God and loving our neighbor. Covenant— that is very easy to say. Covenant— that is dreadfully hard to do.

And yes, we will never be perfect at the work of covenant. Who is? Perfection is not the point.

Doing the work of God is the point. And if Lent is about anything that’s what it is about: striving to do the work and the will of God, striving to love God and love one another. Amen.

03/10/2019
Chenango Valley Home, Norwich, New York

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I earlier mentioned five churches gathered on Ash Wednesday for a Union Service. In the sermon my colleague the Rev. Dr. David Spiegel said this about our imperfection, our sin, and the response of God. ‘We cannot out-sin God, cannot sin in any amount which exceeds God’s capacity to forgive us, God’s fervor in embracing us, God’s willingness to love us.’ How about that? Our imperfection includes our ability to sin. We are not even perfect at that!”

BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. Let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

03/03/2019 ~ Transfiguration Sunday ~ Known in Some Traditions as the Last Sunday Before the Season of Lent ~ Known in Some Traditions as the Fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Communion Sunday ~ Exodus 34:29-35; Psalm 99; 2 Corinthians 3:12-4:2; Luke 9:28-36, (37-43a).

Transfiguration and Reality

“Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” — 2 Corinthians 4:1.

I have often referenced my theater work in my Sunday comments. When I do so most of the time the relationship I draw is to the work of being a writer. This characterization is true.

However, to paint my theater work in a way which is that narrow also short changes what I did. This is a list not of all but of some of what I did.

I was a stage manager for an Off-off Broadway production. I had a hand in designing lighting and sets, even helped build some of those sets.

I directed— both plays and club acts, booked musicians for gigs, coached singers and actors. I was an advisor at the High School of Performing Arts.

I was the business manager of a Children’s Theater. Let me translate that one: I kept track of finances, yes. But drew up schedules— made sure people were where they were supposed to be for performances— wrote grants, one of which was a National Endowment for the Arts which grant we got, grants through which the operation survived.

Last on this brief list, I was an executive with The Actors Fund of America. This is a charitable organization which supports performers and behind-the-scenes workers in arts and entertainment— film, theater, television, music, etc.

The Fund offers social services from financial assistance to employment training. It operates the Actors Home, a nursing and assisted living facility. (Slight pause.)

Now, when I worked for the Fund I was one of two people who went through the estate of Basil Rathbone. Those of you over 50 will know exactly who Basil Rathbone is. Those of you under fifty will probably have to Google him.

Suffice it to say Rathbone, a British character actor, played both heros and villains— Sherlock Holmes and Pontius Pilate to name one of each— and in the 1940s was one of the highest paid Hollywood actors. After Rathbone and his wife died their lawyers rummaged through the estate, got what they thought was of value and handed the rest over to the Fund.

To them what was left looked like— and I’ll use the Yiddish word here— dreck— what was left looked like dreck, rubbish, trash. It was not dreck.

And I plowed through all this stuff. Now, at that point I already had a reputation for evaluating theatrical memorabilia— memorabilia— items of historical interest associated with memorable people.

Right now I don’t and you don’t have time for me to try explain why I had that reputation. Please take it for what it’s worth.

But this is an example of the difference between something of worth and dreck. Rathbone’s first Actors Equity contract, the first time he appeared on Broadway— valuable— no doubt about it. An 8×10 glossy picture of a place setting from a dinner party the Rathbones threw in Hollywood— not so much in terms of value.

Now, when you do something like this— go through what someone has left behind— you need to be ruthless about what is of value and what is not. The picture— dreck; the contract— not dreck, And then you throw the dreck— that picture— out, get rid of it. (Slight pause.)

As of today, I will be the pastor in this place for another 120 days. Let me be blunt: after 23 plus years I am having separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some the dreck from non dreck in my office. I’ve not gotten too far but I’ve started.

I came across this. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) If it looks like newspaper wrapped in rubber hands, that’s what it is. I used this in a Children’s Time not long after I got here.

Why did I save it? This harkens back to my own childhood. When I was perhaps in the first or second grade my friends and I would play what we called baseball in front of the house on the streets of Brooklyn with this.

We were young. So we had little bats and this was what our so-called ball looked like. It would not break any windows, especially care windows. It would not hurt any of us if we were hit by it.

I don’t remember what I said at that Children’s Time. But I have kept this on my desk for 20 plus years.

Why? Probably because it’s about my childhood. But let’s face it. It’s dreck— rubbish, trash, even if I am emotionally attached to it. (Slight pause.)

We hear this in 2 Corinthians: “Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” (Slight pause.)

Every commentary I’ve seen says one thing about this passage. It is very complex. Hence, figuring out what Paul is trying to do here is not easy. But I want to make a suggestion. Paul is encouraging us to go back to essentials— get rid of the dreck, the trash, the rubbish.

You see, I found it fascinating, instructive and informative that this reading is the assigned lection from the Epistles today. Why?

As you heard earlier, today is called Transfiguration Sunday. In each year of the three year lectionary cycle one of the Transfiguration stories is read from one of the Gospels on this Last Sunday Before Lent.

And what is the Transfiguration? Here’s a $64 word, one you also heard earlier. The Transfiguration is a theophany, an experience of the real presence of God.

Which brings us back to Paul. The apostle clearly brings up the Torah, the teachings, Moses, then says this (quote:) “And we… reflect the glory of our God (and) grow brighter and brighter as we are being transformed into the same image we reflect. This is the work of our God, who is Spirit.”

Any Jew in New Testament times would recognize what Paul says here. (Quote:) “the glory of our God”— glory— in Hebrew Kabod— which means the real presence of God. And what is the Transfiguration? It is an experience of the real presence of God.

And that is, I think, why Paul insists ministry is present through God’s mercy and we should not give into discouragement, we should not lose heart. God is present. God walks with us.

That is the reality we Christians claim, the claim of the Transfiguration, the claim of the Resurrection. God is present. God walks with us. (Slight pause.)

To reiterate and be to be blunt: after 23 plus years here I have separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some dreck from non dreck in my office.

And this week I came across some memorabilia. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) But this is dreck. (The pastor drops this object to the floor of the nave.)

Why do I say that? It may tie me emotionally to the past. But should that be my focus? And what should be my focus? (Slight pause.)

For these 23 plus years I have done my best as I tried to focus not on the idea that God is present to me, walks with me. I have tied to focus on the idea that God is present to us— all of us. God walks with us— all of us.

And yes, at times I have been discouraged. At times Paul had to have been discouraged also or the Apostle to the Gentiles would have never written (quote:) “we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.”

And we, you and I, should not be discouraged. We, you and I, should not lose heart. Why?

(Quote:) “We have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” And that, my friends, is not dreck.

Ministry here, in this place, at this time, is granted to us by God and God is with us. God does walk with us. Amen.

03/03/2019
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I am going to say something about my process in preaching. That’s different. Often I don’t say anything about that. I usually work a month or two ahead in planning sermons. I decide on which reading I will preach, I formulate a sermon title and I make notes to myself as to where I think I might go with a sermon. And then I sit down with Mary Williams and shs pushes me. ‘What do you mean by that?’she says. And she helps me think it through. In any case, the note I made over a month ago said: ‘We need to daily realize Christ is with us as we do the work and the will of God. This is a message of the Transfiguration and Paul understood hope is central because of the reality of the Christ. The Transfiguration story— it really is just a story— but it is meant to help us and give language with which we can express a foretaste of the reality of the Risen Christ.’”

BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. So let us live in the light God offers. And, therefore, let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.

02/24/2019 ~ Seventh Sunday after the Epiphany, Known in Some Traditions as the Seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 2 ) ~ Genesis 45:3-11, 15; Psalm 37:1-11, 39-40; 1 Corinthians 15:35-38, 42-50; Luke 6:27-38.

Golden Rules

“Do to others as you would have them do to you.” — Luke 6:31

One of the adjunct professors at Bangor Seminary, the place I went to seminary, Dana Sawyer, had an interesting background. A Native American who grew up on the Penobscot Tribe reservation near Old Town, just north of Bangor, he had a Ph.D. in Far Eastern Religion.

Of course, you do not get that degree without having visited the Far East numerous times. Then he, a Native American with a degree in Far Eastern Religion, returned to Maine to teach at the University level. The particular class he taught at Bangor was, appropriately, World Religions.

This background was fascinating but something he said I found even more fascinating. He insisted the religion most practiced world wide, most practiced in America, was what he called folk religion.

What did he mean? (I could spend a half an hour unpacking that thought.) Here’s an American example he used: Fundamentalism is a folk religion, said he. How so? Fundamentalism has absolutely no basis in historic Christianity and began only in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Following the Civil War, tensions developed among Christians in America. Scholarly Biblical criticism, a practice of Scriptural study which dates back millennia, started to be seen as something which encouraged social and cultural change. That very encouragement of social, cultural change was unacceptable to some, at least in part because of a resistance to social, cultural change.

And so, The Fundamentals, a series of papers, was published between 1910 and 1915, published in Los Angeles of all places, supported by an oil baron, right out of the Gilded Age who had some reason to resist social, cultural change because of his status. The bottom line is Christianity had never seen anything like organized Fundamentalism before. And this was organized by big money.

While many think Fundamentalism is ancient, obviously this is new, a little more than 100 years old. And it is, in fact, a largely American idea. This American idea spread to other faith traditions, Islamic Fundamentalism being the prime example. They had never had Fundamentalists before. I am sure the irony of that is not lost on you.

To put this into perspective, Fundamentalism is not a theological reevaluation of Christianity. This is a social movement, a cultural movement, whose mission was to resist change in society. I need to be clear. I am not saying people who follow Fundamentalism are insincere in what is believed. I am saying the movement itself stems from social, cultural and late origins.

United Church of Christ pastor Lillian Daniel has published a book whose title reflects my sentiments: Tired of Apologizing for a Church I Don’t Belong To is the title. The Christianity I know, the Christianity to which I belong, historic Christianity, cannot be labeled a folk religion as it is not based simply on a current cultural, social trend. Fundamentalism is based on what was a new cultural, social trend just 100 years ago and, hence, as Dana Sayer, my professor, said, can be labeled a folk religion. (Slight pause.)

From time to time many of you have heard me say I have Jesuit training. My follow up line after that is, “Scratch a Jesuit, you get a Protestant.” That would be me.

I was, however, never in a classroom taught by Jesuits. Rather, since my father taught at a Jesuit High School for his entire working career, Jesuits were my friends.

Jesuits came to family parties. I went on trips with Jesuits. I played softball and basketball with Jesuits. Jesuits staffed the Summer camp I attended.

Question: most of the time how do we really learn, especially how do we learn about life, about how to behave, about how life should be lived? We learn from family. We learn from friends.

A competent teacher will tell you a significant chunk of learning happens outside any classroom wall. When Jesuits are friends of the family, it is hard to not be influenced by their thinking, to not learn from their thinking. (Slight pause.)

Jesuit have an interesting practice of which I know. Every ten years they publish a list of four priorities which will be the “mission of the Jesuit order” for the next ten years. They just published a new list.

First, “show the way to God through discernment and… Spiritual Exercises.” Next, “walk with the poor, the outcasts of the world, those whose dignity has been violated, in a mission of reconciliation and justice.” Third, “accompany young people in the creation of a hope-filled future.” Last, “collaborate in the care of (the earth) our Common Home.” (Slight pause.)

We find this being spoken by the Christ in the work known as Luke/Acts in the portion called Luke: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” (Slight pause)

The quote you just heard is often called The Golden Rule. It is found in many faith traditions and in many social traditions, in many cultures. It dates at least back to the Code of Hammurabi, 1,700 yeas before the birth of Christ. (Slight pause.)

Now, I think most of you are aware I had what might be called multiple careers before seminary. One piece of that was a nine year stint on and off working on Wall Street.

Do you know what The Golden Rule on Wall Street is? (Slight pause.) Those who have the gold make the rules. Its corollary is those who have power hoard power. Another corollary: those who dominate strive to perpetuate dominance.

These are cultural, secular golden rules. The question for us around that is simple: is following that golden rule, a cultural golden rule, a secular golden rule, the place to which God calls us, the place to which God calls the church? (Slight pause.)

Occasionally someone will say there are liberal interpretations of the Bible. Others will say there are conservative interpretations. Nether position is accurate.

What I am about to say is neither liberal nor conservative. The challenges with which Scripture presents us as we examine it, as we seek God’s Word and God’s will are multiple when it comes to the culture. The first challenge is that we need to identify the cultural trappings in Scripture which are based on the era in which Scripture was written.

That alone is not easy. After all, the first five books of the Bible, the Pentateuch, contain at least five different documents written over the course of a number centuries and then woven together so they appear to someone who reads the text only in translation and not in the original language to be just one, single, singular document. If you’re reading in the original languages the differences jump out at you.

Each of those documents, woven together as one, written in different eras, need to be unpacked for the cultural content in the era in which they were written. And, when you are reading the words in the original language, it becomes evident sometimes one sentence is written in one era and the very next sentence is written five hundred years later and addresses a different cultural context.

After that, after the cultural contents are identified, the question for us becomes what is God saying? To where does God call us?

So, not only do we need to identify the cultural, social content. We need to neutralize it as we seek the will of God.

But there is another challenge. What does our culture, today, say to us? You see, to identify what our culture today says to us, its influence on us, is an even harder task than looking at an ancient culture in the Scriptural text.

After all, perhaps we cannot fully identify all aspects of an ancient culture. But we can identify many of them.

I think identifying today’s culture is a more daunting challenge. Why? We are living in and with our own culture. It is second nature to us. We do not even notice it.

And just like we should strive to identify cultural practices in ancient times when we read Scripture and naturalize those, we need to identify today’s cultural trends. And then we need to neutralize today’s cultural trends and yet again ask ‘what is God saying?’ ‘To where does God call us?’ ‘To where does God call the church?’

All of this points us to one place when looking at Scripture. Will we be overcome, will we be overwhelmed by the culture which surrounds us when we read Scripture? (Slight pause.)

That brings me back to my friends the Jesuits and their current ten year program. I would sum up that ten year program with just several words: discernment; reconciliation and justice; the creation of a hope-filled future; the earth, our Common Home. (Slight pause.)

As I said, Scripture is neither liberal nor conservative. That summation of the Jesuit program is neither liberal nor conservative. Why? Living into and with these ideas is about a way of life. Living into and with these ideas is how we learn about life, about how we learn to behave, about how life should be lived, about living together.

Christianity is not about rules. Christianity is not about the culture. Christianity is about a way of life. That is one reason why each time the Jesuits post a program it’s for ten years. This is about a ten year exercise in practicing a way of life with specifics. To practice a way of life takes time.

Will anyone ever be perfect at the practice? No. The idea is to practice and strive to improve every day. Perhaps more importantly the idea is to strive, as well as we are able, to see the world as God sees the world. How does God see the world?

I hear this is just one of the things Jesus said about living life as we strive to know God and to know the will of God: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” Now that, my friends, is not a golden rule. That is a counter-cultural idea since those words are about God’s culture, not human culture. Amen.

02/24/2019
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Let me quote Reinhold Niebuhr: ‘Nothing worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime; therefore we must be saved by hope. Nothing true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by faith. Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we must be saved by love.’ Do I get occasionally discouraged? Yes. But I understand my own frailty and mortality. I understand I live in a culture. I understand I need to pay attention to God’s culture. The culture is temporary. God is not.”

BENEDICTION: Let us go in joy and in love and in peace. God reigns. Therefore, let us go forth in the name of Christ proclaiming the peace of God which surpasses understanding. And may the face of God shine upon us; may the presence of Christ be with us; may the fire of the Spirit burn within us this day and forevermore. Amen.