SERMON ~ 10/26/2025 ~ “Apocalypse— Not Now”

10/26/2025 ~ Twentieth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 25 ~ Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Joel 2:23-32; Psalm 65; Sirach 35:12-17 or Jeremiah 14:7-10, 19-22; Psalm 84:1-7; 2 Timothy 4:6-8, 16-18; Luke 18:9-14 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j00HBwVekKY
VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701?video=1131371113

“Then, afterward, / I will pour out my spirit / on all flesh, on all humankind; / your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, / your elders, all of them, / shall have prophetic dreams, / and your young people shall see visions. / In those days / I will pour out my spirit / even on those who are enslaved;…” — Joel 2:28-29.

I got a letter a couple of weeks ago. While it had a local address, right away I realized even if it was somehow local that was not its true origin. It looked too computer generated for that. My bet is some of you got that same letter.

Inside, the words tried to disarm the reader by offering (quote:) “a comforting Bible message.” It said no one needs to worry about the approaching Armageddon, a gathering of armies for the battle marking the end of time. Right— don’t worry— at the end of time is here. That’s comforting— not.

In fact, I am aware at least twice so far this year and in quite threatening tones a date has been named for Armageddon, an end of time. But it did not happen. The only way I can describe that kind of prediction is to say it’s incredibly egocentric.

Why egocentric? Among all the people who have ever lived, anyone who insists the end of time will happen right now is saying they have somehow been chosen to have the privilege of seeing the end of the world. Boy are you special. (Sight pause.)

This kind of rhetoric is clearly theological since it’s often attached to concerns about evil, even about the possibility of an anti-Christ among us. One would think it should be clear to anyone of sound mind that an Armageddon, an approaching apocalypse, the end of time, is not just around the corner.

The Jews living in Roman Palestine, in the First Century of the Common Era, may have thought an apocalypse, an end of time, was just around the corner. Why? The army of a foreign invader, Rome, was living in the homeland of the Jews.

That army crucified about 10,000 Jews every year. 10,000 murdered each year— people must have felt this was a sign of the apocalypse, an end of time. (Slight pause.)

People living in Europe in the 14th Century of the Common Era might have thought an end of time was just around the corner. As many as 200 million people died in what we call the Black Plague or Black Death. It took three centuries for population levels to recover.

In my own lifetime I’ve known people who witnessed the stock market crash in 1929 followed by the Great Depression. That economic disaster devastated the economy both here and worldwide. How bad was it?

I’ve stated this before. In March of 1933 when FDR took office the unemployment rate was 25%. Many might have thought the end of time was at hand. (Slight pause.)

The picture the world presents to us today can be disorienting. We can feel displaced. But is the end of time really at hand? (Slight pause.)

These are words from the Prophet Joel: “Then, afterward, / I will pour out my spirit / on all flesh, on all humankind; / your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, / your elders, all of them, / shall have prophetic dreams, / and your young people shall see visions. / In those days / I will pour out my spirit / even on those who are enslaved;…” (Slight pause.)

It does not matter what the prediction is or who makes it. Prognosticators, prophets, pastors, pundits, pontiffs, priests, prelates, politicians or just plain people— all can be prone to making predictions about the end of time. But the truth is an apocalypse is not going to happen any time soon.

We may not like what is happening right now, feel displaced. But the end of time— nope— not even close.

Perhaps the end of an era is close at hand. And that can be disorienting. But eras, by definition, happen in a limited time frame.

To paraphrase and rephrase Voltaire’s Candide, today is not the best of all possible worlds. I get that. But it has never been the best of all possible worlds.

Indeed, was the Roman occupation or the plague of the 14th Century or the Great Depression the best of all possible worlds? No. But neither was it the end of time. So, what are these words from Joel, words repeated by Peter after the Pentecost event, about? [1] (Slight pause.)

The obvious question: if it is not the end of time why do people feel they need to speak in those terms, even Joel and Peter? We should realize apocalyptic language uses wonderful, powerful metaphors to describe what a deep experience of God feels like.

So these words were not and are not insisting on an apocalypse, an ending, but rather proclaiming joy because they rejoice in and hope for a beginning. This is about the possibility of a beginning of the realm of God— a beginning of the realm of God— right here, right now.

As I said earlier, an apocalyptic argument is a theological argument. But an apocalyptic argument, apocalyptic language is not about the end of time. Neither is it an argument about who wins or loses, about who gets to heaven and who does not, although some would have it that way.

Apocalyptic language is meant to reflect hope. To think apocalyptic language says the end of the world is at hand, is not a theological position. To claim apocalyptic language says the end of time is near lacks an understanding of its intent. (Slight pause.)

In a couple of minutes we will be invited to sing the hymn Christians Rise and Act Your Creed. What is our creed? The creed of Christians is not about specific beliefs. The creed of Christians is certainly not about an apocalypse, an end of time.

The creed of Christians is about action— positive action. Hence, the creed of Christians is about freedom, peace, justice, joy, equity, love. Thereby, the creed of Christians is very much about hope.

So here’s a predication for you. From now until forever we will find hope in the fact that God loves us. Amen.

10/26/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Question: what is theology? I’ve said this here before: the Hebrews did not have a theology. The Hebrews did theology. That is what theology is about: a true theology is about the action we call loving God and loving neighbor.”

BENEDICTION: God stands by us to grant us support and strength. All who trust in God are strengthened and blessed. So, let us go on our way, proclaiming the Good News: when we question and when we are open, when we struggle to know God’s will and walk in God’s way, God will be our refuge. And may the face of God shine upon us; may the peace of Christ rule among us, the fire of the Spirit burn within us this day and forevermore. Amen.

[1] Peter’s words from Acts 2 were noted when this passage from Joel was introduced.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 10/19/2025 ~ “Covenant of the Heart”

10/19/2025 ~ Nineteenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 24 ~ Twenty-ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Jeremiah 31:27-34; Psalm 119:97-104; Genesis 32:22-31; Psalm 121; 2 Timothy 3:14-4:5; Luke 18:1-8 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0qI49oPtnM ~ VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701?video=1129537798

“…this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says Yahweh: I will put my Law within them, in their minds and I will write it on their hearts. I will be their God; they shall be my people.” — Jeremiah 31:33.

Fiddler on the Roof is the famous Broadway musical set in the Tsarist Russia of 1905. It’s based on the short stories of Sholem Aleichem, pen name of the writer Salomon Rabinovich. All the stories by this author were written in Yiddish and Sholem Aleichem means “peace be with you” in Yiddish.

Fiddler concentrates on the story of Tevye, the dairy farmer, and his family. The narrative tells us about this family and their attempts to maintain their traditions while the world encroaches on their lives and on their world.

The three eldest daughters are strong-willed young women. Their choice of husbands moves them away from the traditions to which the people in this small town are accustomed.

Further, in the turbulent times at the start of the Twentieth Century, the Tsarist government evicts these Jews from their town. But this government, itself, will soon be overthrown by the Communist Revolution.

Despite or perhaps because of the forces of change, the story keeps coming back to the people in the town, the personal, the individual, these people battered by change, changing times, forces beyond their control. But they do seek to find an anchor in the intimate relationships they have built over time.

This concept is well illustrated when Tevye explains to Golde, his wife, that one daughter wants to get married to someone she loves rather than go into the arranged marriage they envisioned for her, the normal custom in the village. In a song, Tevye and his wife reflect on what true love might mean.

Tevye asks Golde: “Do you love me?” Golde responds: “Do I what?” In a heartfelt, gruff way Teyve asks again: “Do you love me?”

Goldie thinks all the changes have overwhelmed her husband. “Do I love you? / With our daughters getting married / And this trouble in the town / You’re upset, you’re worn out / Go inside, go lie down! / Maybe it’s indigestion.”

Tevye will not be deterred: “Golde, I’m asking you a question… Do you love me?”

Golde then becomes reflective and practical: “Do I love you? / For twenty-five years I’ve washed your clothes / Cooked your meals, cleaned your house / Given you children, milked the cow / After twenty-five years, why talk about love now?”

Turning to some unseen audience (it is God to whom she speaks?), she adds this: “For twenty-five years I’ve lived with him / Fought him, starved with him / Twenty-five years my bed is his / If that’s not love, what is?” (Slight pause.)

The song concludes— together they admit they love one another. “It doesn’t change a thing / But even so / After twenty-five years / It’s nice to know.” Hence, they end the duet voicing a singular thought. The relationship they developed over time took time to develop and they worked at it. This clearly is love by any definition. (Slight pause.)

We live in our own tumultuous times today. Or at least it can feel a little nuts. It can feel like a lot of people are acting just a little… off… sometimes more than a little. Author Malcolm Gladwell writes books that explore change in society. He tells this story about giving a talk in a wealthy, suburban community. He pointed out to this audience that in the 1950s the tax rate for the wealthy people ran just over 90%. [1]

The audience refuses to believe him. Some in the crowd started to hiss. [2] And, since he was speaking at a dinner function, someone even tossed a roll in his direction. This reaction was one of anger, perhaps fear or maybe the other way around— fear then anger. But why be fearful or angry?

Gladwell did not make up these facts. So when someone throws a dinner roll at you for merely stating a fact, it proves we live in tumultuous times. And perhaps it does feel like it’s nuts when people refuse to pay attention to facts or are willfully ignorant of facts.

When presented with facts that do not match someone’s preconceived position, the result can be fear and anger. Of course, that’s what happened in Tsarist Russia— a toxic combination of a preconceived position, willful ignorance, fear and anger.

People were fearful about and of the Jewish minority. As a minority, Jews were also often isolated in small villages, ghettos. Given that, the willful ignorance of the majority morphed into fear, fear into anger, anger into violence.

The pogroms of the Tsar and later from Central Committee of the Soviet Union, took center stage. In short, ignorance, fear and anger translated not just into isolated violence but systemic violence. All this was a result of failing to know the facts but, perhaps more tragically, willfully ignoring the facts. (Slight pause.)

This is what we hear in the work known as Jeremiah: “…this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says Yahweh: I will put my Law within them, in their minds and I will write it on their hearts. I will be their God; they shall be my people.” (Slight pause.)

What is love? Is love infatuation? Is love an attraction? Is love simply an emotional high? Or does love, as Tevye and Golde suggest, have its real basis in deeply knowing someone. Does love have its real basis in growth? (Slight pause.)

Please notice, the promise of God is to write the knowledge of God on both the hearts and on the minds of people. Hence, the claim here is we are so deeply known by God that the fact of this intimacy produces forgiveness. Therefore, perhaps the thing to which we need to be open is for us to grow in our own intimacy with God, in our own knowledge of God.

This is clear: when growth is abandoned or simply ignored, fear is embraced. Covenant love is the opposite of that. Covenant love, as proclaimed by and in Scripture, is commitment to understanding, a commitment to respect, a commitment to… growth.

True love is not merely an infatuation nor is it only an attraction nor is it simply an emotional high. Love is something which develops, which grows.

Why? How? Love comes from knowledge, cumulative knowledge, of others, knowledge which is intentionally pursued. When a commitment to covenant love, a commitment to growth is made, a deep, enduring love is empowered to develop. When commitment to covenant love is made, growth happens. (Slight pause.)

I want to suggest the love God writes on our minds and on our hearts is already there, already present. Too often we employ willful ignorance to ignore it instead of embracing it. And there is only one way to embrace it. To love deeply and to love over time we must learn love by engaging it over time.

One more point: this reading starts with an assumption— that we will always be loved by God. Indeed, that is one reason God insist we are forgiven— because we are loved.

So the challenge for us is simple: God has made a commitment to us and invites us to be committed also. Therefore, will we become committed to loving God? Will we become committed to covenant love which is embodied by and enwrapped by constant growth, growth which will lead us to love each other? Amen.

10/19/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Benediction. This is a précis of what the pastor said before the blessing: “One thought for Meditation in the bulletin today is from H. Richard Neibuhr. (Quote:): ‘Christianity is permanent revolution.’ He then uses the Greek word for permanent revolution— metanoia. ‘Metanoia does not come to an end in this world, this life or this time.’ I need to add that for me, ‘permanent revolution’ does not mean chaos nor a tumultuous time. Metanoia means being open to constant growth.”

BENEDICTION: God has made us partners in covenant. Let us truly be God’s people. Let us be guided by prayer, by study, by justice, by growth, by love. Let us continually praise the God of the universe who loves us. May our trust grow as we are empowered to do God’s work in this, God’s dominion. And may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God that we are in awe of no one and nothing else. Amen.

[1] https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/income-taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uskJWrOQ97I

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 10/05/2025 ~ “Having Faith”

10/05/2025 ~ Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 22 ~ Twenty-seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Lamentations 1:1-6; Lamentations 3:19-26 or Psalm 137; Habakkuk 1:1-4; 2:1-4; Psalm 37:1-9; 2 Timothy 1:1-14; Luke 17:5-10 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701?video=1125576483
VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701?video=1125576483

“Jesus gave this answer: ‘If you had faith the size of a mustard seed, you could say to this mulberry tree, ‘Be uprooted and plant yourself in the sea,’ and it would obey you.’” — Luke 17:6.

You may have noticed I was not in the pulpit last week. So what did this pastor and spouse do on a scheduled Sunday away?

Bonnie and I indulged in a little nostalgia as we visited the Seashore Trolley Museum in Kennebunk. It was nostalgic because the last time we visited it was on our abbreviated four day honeymoon (the pastor mumbles a number) years ago.

It was nostalgic for me, personally, on one other count. I do have a memory of riding on a New York City trolley when I was very young.

Speaking of nostalgia, the museum had what it called a 2000 World Series Subway car. It was labeled that way because the Mets and the Yankees played in the series that year.

It was the first Subway series since the New York Yankees played the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1956. But, native New Yorker that I am, I recognized it as a car from the number 7 train, the Flushing line, before I even saw the World Series banner displayed in front of it.

Right now the museum is celebrating Pumpkin Patch days with special things for children to do. So a trolley ride includes a stop at a pumpkin patch— really just pumpkins sitting in a field where the children can retrieve their own pumpkin.

That ensured a multitude of youngsters were there. And so we sat in the second row on the trolley ride we took, an open air trolley with just seats, no doors or windows. In the first row along with parents were four children, probably age five or younger, staring down the track and watching every move the trolley operator made.

Each youngster was dressed in a super-hero costume, capes and all, from Captain America to Spider-Man. Perhaps it was the nostalgia bubbling up in me but I was suddenly projected into my childhood.

I remembered as a kid, despite being from the city, my brother and I would dress up as cowboys trying to be like Gene Autry or Hopalong Cassidy. As I reflected on that I realized we were just trying to emulate the super-heros of our time. Indeed, the youngsters last week and my brother and myself years ago, they are and we were merely reflecting the fantasies created and broadcast by the cultures in the era in which we live. (Slight pause.)

I’ve said this before, we often have a hard time recognizing the influence the presiding culture has on our lives, on our thinking, even on our faith. So in order to not be swept up in whatever fad is current in the culture, we ourselves need to be prepared, educated enough to separate reality from fantasy, fact from fiction, real information from mere spin, certainty from contrivance.

But it’s also true that no one has the time, patience, energy or God-like omni-presence to fully accomplish that. Society can be exhausting. (Slight pause.)

These words are from the section of Scripture known as Luke/Acts: “Jesus gave this answer: ‘If you had faith the size of a mustard seed, you could say to this mulberry tree, ‘Be uprooted and plant yourself in the sea,’ and it would obey you.’” (Slight pause.)

Question: is faith about having answers or asking questions? Clearly, one of the bywords in popular culture, one of the tribal beliefs in the folk ways of American life, is that someone with a deep faith never questions. But is that accurate, or is it merely a rallying cry of the parochial tribalism rampant in our culture, a position without substance, without a credible basis in Scripture or Christian tradition or Christian history?

Certainly our culture is fond of predictable messages and easy answers, fond of slogans like “Be who you are!” “Don’t forget where you came from!” or “Stay the course!” These are not necessarily examples of bad advice. They can be even comfortable places to rest when we are weary.

But these messages can readily become a dominant way of thinking, especially when they are heard incessantly, insisted on and because of that perpetuated. That’s when platitudes deteriorate into exercises of questionable judgement.

But these catch phrases are just slogans, not solid, grounding principles. Hence, when abused, this kind of populist, cultural sloganeering serves not to inform choices but to limit choices.

Indeed, I think when it comes to the ways of popular culture, we need to be quite wary about and watchful of its often intimidating force. When we ignore reality because of being intimidated by the culture I call that position willful ignorance.

Let’s look at the words of Jesus. Contrary to what the slogan of the popular culture suggests, that faith is an unmovable rock, the plea for faith in this passage conveys the recognition that faith is a dynamic process. Hence, one can become mature in faith by understanding that faith is a process.

In today’s reading the disciples have bought into the popular culture of their time. They thereby give guidance for our time. In asking for an increase in faith, they seem to indicate faith is something you can quantify: if only you get more faith, they will be all right. Everything will be all right.

Jesus shatters their cultural illusions about faith and, perhaps, ours. The point is not that they need more faith; rather, they need to understand faith enables God to work in the life of a person in ways which can defy ordinary human experience. Faith does not increase; faith learns, faith matures, and it is hence empowered to become discerning.

This passage about the mustard seed is, therefore, not about doing miraculous works or spectacular tricks like throwing a mulberry tree into the sea because one has increased faith. On the contrary, the assurance of Jesus is that with even a little faith the disciples can live by the teachings Jesus offers on discipleship. [1] (Slight pause.)

Faith, you see, is a journey, a process which includes being unsure, taking risks. Theologian Søren Kierkegaard said this (quote:), “Without risk, faith is an impossibility.”— “Without risk, faith is an impossibility.”

It’s understandable that popular culture carries in it some definitive positions and directions like take no risks. But sloganeering is not life sustaining; it is merely popular.

I maintain faith which is life sustaining, which can uproot trees, is harder to understand than that for which popular culture allows. I think that’s because our popular culture is not open to a God who might defy our expectations.

Further, faith does make all things possible when it is tempered by and intertwined with the inclusive nature of unconditional love. Faith intertwined with the inclusive nature of unconditional love can steer us in wonderful directions.

That’s because faith without the anchor known as love has lost its moral compass. And love is not only dynamic and alive but needs to be at the center of all moral judgments. Unless love shows us the way, the moral compass is broken— our moral compass is broken. (Slight pause.)

To come back to the youngsters at the trolley museum and to the days of my youth, super heros are fine when you’re young and simple explanations suffice. But super heros— and it does not matter if they wear capes or 10 gallon hats— super heros don’t exist. They are cartoons, fantasies.

Or as Bonnie puts it, adult-ing is hard and tiring but we need to do it. Since adults need to work constantly on the process I call mature faith, the process of mature faith needs to be intertwined with and happens only when unconditional love is practiced. Amen.

Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine
10/05/20254

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Benediction. This is a précis of what was said: “We opened this service with the hymn Great Is Your Faithfulness. Here’s the paradox the hymn presents: it does not speak of our faithfulness. It speaks of the faithfulness of God. So, here’s a one sentence précis of the hymn: God trusts us and entrusts to us the care of the world. Isn’t that amazing? Only after that initial, unwavering trust is offered to us, does God invite us, not demand but invite us, to offer our trust back to God. Trusting us while demanding nothing in return is a definition of unconditional love.”

BENEDICTION: We are called by God to serve faithfully, trusting in God’s grace. May the gifts of God be rekindled within and among us. May our trust grow as we are empowered to do God’s work in this, God’s dominion. And may the peace of Christ which surpasses our understanding keep our hearts and minds in the knowledge and companionship of God’s Spirit this day and forevermore. Amen.

[1] This analysis is found in The New Interpreter’s Bible, the Electronic Edition.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 09/21/2025 ~ “Balm”

09/21/2025 ~ Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 20 ~ Twenty-fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Jeremiah 8:18-9:1; Psalm 79:1-9; Amos 8:4-7; Psalm 113; 1 Timothy 2:1-7; Luke 16:1-13 ~ VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701?video=1121554745
YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1qWxksIOX8

“Is there no balm in Gilead? / Is there no physician there? / Why, then, has the health of my poor people / not been attended to, restored?” — Jeremiah 8:22

Karen Armstrong is British, a former nun and scholar of comparative religion who first rose to prominence with a New York Times best seller A History of God. In Armstrong’s research about religion she places an emphasis on the Golden Rule: ‘Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.’

In 2008 with her guidance, $100,000 in funding was set up by a non-profit to help develop and spread a document known as the Charter for Compassion. It’s an expression of the universal truth found in the Golden Rule and an effort to identify shared moral priorities and foster global understanding among traditions.
The signers of the Charter are quite diverse. Among them are the Dalai Lama, the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Deepak Chopra and Paul Simon (to name a few). You yourself can find the Charter on line and add your name as a signer if you wish.

In the first of several paragraphs the charter says (quote:) “The principle of compassion lies at the heart of all religious, ethical and spiritual traditions, calling us always to treat all others as we wish to be treated ourselves. Compassion impels us to work tirelessly to alleviate the suffering of our fellow creatures, to dethrone ourselves from the center of our world and put another there and to honor the inviolable sanctity of every single human being, treating everybody, without exception, with absolute justice, equity and respect.” [1] (Slight pause.)

Now, some would say this document is not Biblical since its contents do not directly quote the Bible. And that is true. But it’s also accurate to say the document affirms Biblical principles. Think about that. (Slight pause.)

These words are from the Scroll of the Prophet Jeremiah: “Is there no balm in Gilead? / Is there no physician there? / Why, then, has the health of my poor people / not been attended to, restored?” (Slight pause.)

Intercessory prayer is a difficult task for many people. Sometimes we simply do not know what to ask for. We feel helpless in presenting to God our needs or presenting for a troubled friend or family member whose need baffles us.

At other times we become fearful of asking for too much, lest our very prayers begin to make sharp demands on us to supply for the needs of those for whom we pray— like food for the hungry and companionship for the lonely. Put another way, if you, yourself, aren’t trying to do something why are you just praying about it? (Slight pause.)

In this text from Jeremiah, the prophet mourns because the people have brought about their own isolation from Yahweh while Yahweh, in fact, longs to save the people. The lament of the prophet is clear (quote:) “Hark! Hear the cry of my people / who are in distress; / hear that cry far and wide / from a distant land: / ‘Is Yahweh not in Zion?”

This is an intercessory prayer. And what does prayer do? What is prayer about? Prayer is a dialogue, a conversation with God which names the issue and seeks the will of God. The prophet names the issue, the situation— and then pleads for mercy.

But it is also clear that Yahweh, God, is in anguish. So, it is not just Jeremiah’s joy that is gone but the joy of Yahweh as well.

Why? The people provoke Yahweh with (quote): “their graven images, / with their carved images / with their foreign gods.” In its own way this is also a lament, a lament of God’s.

Indeed, when we understand this prayer of the prophet as a true dialogue with God this prayer can become transformative, perhaps life changing for us if you understand it that way. There is also dialogue in the way God responds since there is a naming of the issue, the situation that the people are not listening to the Voice of God.

After all, if one does not listen to the Voice of God, how can there be any hope for dialogue? (Slight pause.) But the eternal question remains: what does the Voice of God say? To where is the Voice of God calling us? (Slight pause.)

I am quite sure there are some who would construe this passage to mean God is a vengeful God. Some might even say a vengeful, angry God is good and dwell on the thought that God might be merciless.

I’m not sure why. That seems to insist the reactions of God are merely human reactions— reactions of violence. This simply turns God into another human.

To talk of God as violent also seems an attempt to domesticate God, transform God, to make God petty and petulant. That kind of response suggests God lacks compassion. (Slight pause.)

So, if this is really a dialogue between the prophet and God, where does it come down? If this is really a dialogue between the prophet and God what is the sentiment being expressed in this prayer? (Slight pause.)

The words of this passage clearly ask a specific question: “Is there no balm in Gilead?” Now, you probably noticed we used the well known hymn There Is a Balm in Gilead. That lyric turns the question around. The hymn states the presence of a balm in the positive.

In short, the hymn insists the physician— God— is there for us. The compassion of God, a compassion which is an overriding theme in Scripture, a theme central to Scripture and central to our relationship with God is expressed in the hymn.

And the hymn says that compassion is not just there, it is real. In fact, later, in the Ninth Chapter of Jeremiah, words are recorded in the Voice of God which make the commitment of God to a relationship of covenant clear. (Slight pause.)

I do need you to notice the hymn There Is a Balm in Gilead comes out of the African American tradition of hymns, comes out of a severely oppressed community. It dates back to at least 1854, probably further. So why has this hymn turned the lament around?

There are plenty of hymns out of this oppressed community which express lament. I suspect this particular hymn comes from a place of understanding that not only is praying— and please realize hymns are a form of prayer— I suspect this comes out of a prayer being the fact that a prayer is the aforementioned two way street. That two way street is the reality of a covenant of relationship.

And what is a relationship of covenant? A relationship of covenant is a commitment— it’s a commitment to mutual growth. Mutual growth is impossible without dialogue. If one side refuses to dialogue with God, refuses to grow, refuses to learn, the covenant is abandoned. God is abandoned.

All that is to say, compassion is a central aspect of covenant— compassion is a central aspect of covenant. Compassion needs to be a central aspect of our relationships with one another. Compassion is the central aspect of the relationship God has with us. And what is compassion? Compassion is the balm in Gilead. Amen.

09/21/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Benediction. This, then, is a précis of what the pastor said before the blessing: “Yahweh in the reading is provoked by ‘their graven images, / with their carved images / with their foreign gods.’ I think this is clear: you, me, we all have foreign gods of some kind lurking somewhere in our subconscious. For some, that foreign god is tribalism. Tribalism says anyone not like us or even not like me, needs to be a target. That is not the compassion which we claim God seeks, is it?”

BENEDICTION: We are commissioned by God to carry God’s peace into the world. Our words and our deeds will be used by God, for we become messengers of God’s Word in our action. Let us recognize that God’s transforming power is forever among us. And may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God that we are in awe of no one and nothing else. Amen.

[1] http://charterforcompassion.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 09/14/2025 ~ “False Gods”

09/14/2025 ~ Fourteenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 19 ~ Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Jeremiah 4:11-12, 22-28; Psalm 14; Exodus 32:7-14; Psalm 51:1-10; 1 Timothy 1:12-17; Luke 15:1-10 ~ OR ~ 09/14/2025 ~ Holy Cross ~ Numbers 21:4b-9; Psalm 98:1-5 or Psalm 78:1-2, 34-38; 1 Corinthians 1:18-24; John 3:13-17 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUrKzj8LkE4 ~ VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/1120408761

“Yahweh, God, said to Moses, ‘Go down from the mountain now! Your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves, acted perversely; in a very short time they have been quick to turn from the way I have given them; they have made for themselves, cast for themselves an image of a calf.’” — Exodus 32:7-8.

Those of you who know my wife, Bonnie, know she has an outstanding sense of humor. She agreed to marry me which proves she has an outstanding sense of humor.

Another example of her sense of humor: back when I first entered Seminary she would be asked ‘Why did Joe decide to go to Seminary?’ Bonnie’s response: “Well, he needed to find some way to justify his collection of Bibles.”

But I was interested in Scripture way before I had a collection of Bibles. By my early twenties I had already read a lot about the Bible and its origins. That gave me a fairly good grasp of what happened in the course of the one thousand years plus it took for this collection of writings to come together, what we today commonly call the Bible.

Please note, despite outward appearances (the Pastor hold up a Study Bible) the Bible is not one book, one work. It’s a group of books, works, collected in the course of a thousand plus years, written and edited by multiple authors and editors, most of whose names we don’t really know.

Further, within those books there are many forms of writing— poetry, prose, lyrics, parables, history, ritual, story-telling— to name just a few. Each form comes with its own stylistic and linguistic parameters and baggage. And of course, not one word of it is written in a language with which most of us are familiar.

What I just said is not some kind of specialized knowledge you get in seminary. This is common knowledge, accessible to anyone interested in discovering it, the kind information you might get in an undergraduate course in the Bible as literature.

That leads to a story about my time Seminary, a place where you become an old timer, get to know the ropes, pretty quickly. After I had been there just a year I took a new student, someone who was about my age and also a second career person, under my wing.

A short time after the semester started I got an emergency call from him. He had just left his first Hebrew Scriptures class, shocked beyond words. Why? The professor talked about what I just said— the Bible, a thousand years, multiple authors, etc., etc.

It was a revelation to him. A faithful church person, he had even been the Moderator at his church but he said he had never heard this before. (Slight pause.)

I think it’s possible he’d actually heard this information before, maybe even in church. But that thousand years, multiple authors stuff does not fit our cultural picture of the Bible which can be summed up with this phrase: one inerrant book— a cultural picture.

Because that’s our cultural picture people often ignore basic information about Scripture, refuse to process it or cannot process it. Thereby, it’s not that these facts get rejected. They are not even heard because our brains get trapped by the culture.

Falsehoods cherished by the cultural replaces facts because of cultural blinders. Put another way, cultural blinders produce false gods. (Slight pause.)

We find these words in the work known as Exodus: “Yahweh, God, said to Moses, ‘Go down from the mountain now! Your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves, acted perversely; in a very short time they have been quick to turn from the way I have given them; they have made for themselves, cast for themselves an image of a calf.’” (Slight pause.)

The episode of the golden calf comes quickly on the heels of the Exodus event, itself. Scholars say the Exodus event is the pivotal, central episode of the Hebrew Scriptures. Please note: popular culture says the central episode of the Hebrew Scriptures is Moses receiving the “ten commandments.” It’s not.

In fact, our culture’s central event of the Hebrew Scriptures— those “ten commandments”— are not known in Hebrew as the ten commandments but as the ten words. The Hebrew language does not even have a command tense.

Now, the golden calf, this statue the Israelites create, reflects an image of a god which would have been common in the era and the place where all this happens. That cultural given is one reason the Israelites would have readily (quote:) “…worshiped it and made sacrifice to it…”

The golden calf is a familiar god, a common god in the culture which surrounds the Israelites. And it is, of course, a false god.

The problem with false gods, cultural gods, is they do not reflect any kind of true, accurate, deep or spiritual reality. On the other hand, what makes false gods so attractive, tenacious and even emotionally satisfying is they do reflect cultural reality.

So from a Biblical perspective any cultural god is suspect. Why? Cultural gods point toward a “what”— a calf for instance. God, you see, is a person with Whom we are in relationship. If we are in a real relationship with God we, by definition, trust God.

After all, what kind of relationship or trust can really be had with a golden calf? And since we cannot trust false gods, when we do worship false gods— and we do worship false gods— that lack of trust produces one thing and one thing only— fear.

You see, the biggest, most important and sinister calf for the Israelites and for us is not something as tangible as a statue. The biggest, most important and sinister calf for we humans is fear.

Indeed, why were the Israelites worshiping a golden calf? Fear— Moses had disappeared onto the mountain. They were worried their leader wouldn’t come back.

Thinking of Moses rather than God as their leader is their first golden calf. Then creating the golden calf they choose to go down a path toward fear, the ultimate golden calf.

To make anyone or anything more important than God leads to worship of the cultural god called fear. A lack of trust in God eventually and always translates into fear. (Slight pause.)

For a moment I want to address how trust and love intertwine. First, it’s sometimes said the opposite of love is not hate but apathy. Apathy is when you don’t even care enough to hate. But I think the opposite of love is neither hate nor is it apathy. The opposite of love is fear. (Slight pause.)

It’s probably obvious from how much it’s covered in the media that we live in a society wracked with fear. Fear is rampant in our culture. I think fear is rampant in our culture because we worship calves, false gods— a lot of them— especially fear.

Indeed, the list of the cultural false gods in modern society is long and easy to compile. Our false gods might include sports, television, celebrities, politics, security. I’m sure you can each supply your own list of false gods. I don’t need to do that for you.

The next thing I need to say about love and trust— and love and trust being intertwined— is that you cannot love without trust. You cannot trust without love.

In the wedding ceremony I use when the partners exchange covenant promises the words say they will love and trust each other in what they already know and they will love and trust each other in what they do not yet know. The bottom line: love and trust can and must transcend mere knowledge. (Slight pause.)

To summarize, the real false god, the most prevalent false god in our world, in our culture, is fear. And there are a lot of people today who would send and sell that message: you need to be afraid.

Of course, not only does the society worship fear. Fear tries to drive away love by trying to make a mockery of it. But we Christians— we Christians believe God is love. What a novel idea— God… is… love. Amen.

09/14/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is a précis of what was said: “Corrie ten Boom was a Dutch writer, a Christian who, along with her father and other family members, helped many Jews escape the Holocaust during World War II. Her most famous book is The Hiding Place. This is a quote from her writings. ‘Never be afraid to trust an unknown future to a known God.’”

BENEDICTION: Eternal God, you have bound us together in a common life. Help us, in the midst of our striving for justice and truth, to confront one another in love, and to work together with mutual patience, acceptance and respect. Send us out, sure in Your grace and Your peace with surpasses understanding, to live faithfully. And may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God, that we are in awe of no one else and nothing else. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 09/07/2025 ~ “A Prisoner for Christ Jesus?”

09/07/2025 ~ Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost~ Proper 18 ~ Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Jeremiah 18:1-11; Psalm 139:1-6, 13-18; Deuteronomy 30:15-20; Psalm 1; Philemon 1:1-21; Luke 14:25-33 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSor7DkTdqA
VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/1117495587

“Grace and peace from Abba, God, and our Savior, Jesus, the Christ.” — Philemon 1:3.

You have heard me say this before. I’m a baseball fan. But I don’t root for any team since my team, the Brooklyn Dodgers, died in 1957. And no, the West Coast version of the Dodgers does not count. (Slight pause.)

Now, back in the mid-50s, my family had a television and the games I saw broadcast from Ebbets Field by Red Barber and Vince Scully were in black and white. Hence, a sensory perception forever seared into my brain is from the first time I went to Ebbets Field to see Robinson, Reese, Furillo, Hodges and Campanella play in person.

I remember holding my Father’s hand as we came up a ramp and out of the shadows into the bright sunlight of the second deck. I was taken aback by the brilliant green of the grass, the clay tones of the infield, the dazzling white and blue of the home team uniforms, the colorful advertising on the outfield walls.

After seeing the reality of all those colors when I looked at a game on a black-and-white television it was disappointing. The experience changed how I thought about what I saw on the screen, even changed how I saw the world. To use a word a youngster would not have used, this changed the paradigm of my understanding. (Slight pause.)

In the essay Defining the Church for Our Time, the Rev. Dr. Peter Schmiechen discusses structures and practices that describe church. The list ranges from worship to sacraments to music to creeds to marriage to fellowship to stewardship to governance.

Then the Rev. Dr. Schmiechen states that we may love all of these practices, all of these structures, but these structures and practices are not the foundation of the church. The true foundation of church is the new life of Christ and the Spirit— the new life of Christ and the Spirit. (Slight pause.)

This is what we hear in the work known as Philemon: “Grace and peace from Abba, God, and our Savior, Jesus, the Christ.” (Slight pause.)

I have often said this. We need to understand New Testament times in order to comprehend what’s being said in the writings of that era. So let’s look at that.

We know Paul was imprisoned several times. But what offense warranted incarceration? There are several levels here but one key is the Jewish understanding of God.

For the Jews God is One. But this is a polytheistic world. The normal understanding of the culture, a paradigm of the time, said there are many gods.

Hence, to say there is one God was a radical proclamation. However, the Romans— polytheistic but devout— saw Judaism as an ancient religion. Therefore, for them the idea of One God was old but it was quaint. So they allowed for it and did not force the Jews to worship their Roman gods.

Another thing we don’t understand today is in New Testament times most people, other than the Jews, thought of Caesar as a divine being, one god among many gods.

Given that, here’s a probable reason Paul is in shackles: treason. After all, Paul proclaims the kin-ship— that’s k-i-n-s-h-i-p— kin-ship, the relationship of God and Jesus and proclaims Jesus lives. Thus, Paul proclaims someone of this era other than Caesar is divine. That’s a treasonous message if there ever was one. (Slight pause.)

I think all these facts should bring us to ask what are the foundations of a church, our church? The reality of God who walks among us is what Paul claims. Given that, the next thing to unpack here is what Paul says about slavery within this ancient context.

In our civilization today, slavery— the owning of another human being— is clearly immoral. But it was not immoral in New Testament times.

However, every commentary today says while Paul is being diplomatic the Apostle addresses the incompatibility of slavery and Christianity. Paul does not directly request that Philemon, a slave holder, set Onesimus, a slave, free. But Paul suggests the ties that bind people together in Christ transforms and changes assumed cultural patterns, current paradigms.

The whole premise of this letter is that Christians live in profound connection to Christ so one’s behavior must reflect that connection. Belonging to God through Christ changes paradigms.

This new paradigm is a totally different way of thinking for this time and place where slavery is a given. The love God shows through Christ says the dignity and the integrity of each person counts, no exceptions. (Slight pause.)

So, what is the foundation of the church? It’s not its structures and practices which too often tend to be simply current paradigms. The first Congregationalists, for instance, did not sing hymns. We do. The foundation of the church is that we are one in Christ.

Schmiechen says in the church we find the new life of Christ and the Spirit. Paul puts it this way (quote): “Grace and peace from Abba, God, and our Savior, Jesus, the Christ.”

In short, we need to strip away the cultural baggage of the Roman Empire in the New Testament writings. Then we need to strip away the cultural baggage of Twenty-first Century society, something which may be even harder to do. At that point we can see our true paradigm: in Christ, through Christ, we are loved by God. (Slight pause.)

When I saw the reality of the colors at Ebbets Field I could never see baseball the same way again. It was a paradigm shift.

We need a paradigm shift in our time. Our relationship with God must not be based on cultural baggage, the cultural baggage of Rome, the baggage of our times or even the cultural baggage of the church. Our paradigm needs to be that our relationship with God is based on the love God offers to each of us and all of us as that love is illuminated for us in Christ. Amen.

09/07/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE— It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Congregational Response and Benediction. This is a précis of what was said: “Just like New Testament times, perhaps our biggest impediment to a relationship with God is the cultural baggage our times imposes on us. Our culture says, for instance, the poor cause their own poverty but the economic system in which we live carries absolutely no culpability in creating poverty. Really? Wow! Then there must be a whole lot of people who really want to live in poverty. They must be lining up to volunteer to live that way. I don’t think so. The idea that the poor cause their own poverty is, my friends, a definition of cultural blindness.”

BENEDICTION: O God, you have bound us together in a common life. Help us, in the midst of our striving for justice and truth, to confront one another in love, and to work together with mutual patience, acceptance and respect. Send us out, sure in Your grace and Your peace with surpasses understanding, to live faithfully. And may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God, that we are in awe of no one else and nothing else. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 08/24/2025 ~ “Qualifications”

08/24/2025 ~ Eleventh Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 16 ~ Twenty-first Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Jeremiah 1:4-10; Psalm 71:1-6; Isaiah 58:9b-14; Psalm 103:1-8; Hebrews 12:18-29; Luke 13:10-17 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozV4N9dxTjs ~ VIDEO OF THE FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/1113263936

“…Yahweh said to me, ‘Do not say, “I am too young.” Go to wherever and to whomever I send you. Say whatever I command you. Do not fear anyone, for I am with you to protect you,….’” — Jeremiah 1:7-8

I probably need to start my comments with an apology because I’m going to talk about theater and, of course, I have this background in professional theater. But Bonnie and I have season tickets to the Maine State Music Theater. We attend on the first Sunday night of the run. So two weeks ago today we experienced the last show scheduled for this season, West Side Story.

I have seen at least, and maybe more, three professional productions of this classic theater work. And I think the folks at Maine State did a very good job.

All of the people behind the original production are thought of as giants in this art form but they are now all deceased. I want name just three of them. The music is by Leonard Bernstein, lyrics by Stephen Sondheim and the direction and choreography is by Jerome Robbins.

Something struck me as this Maine State version unfolded I had not thought about a lot before. The score could be called “through composed.” That means in the course of the play the music both tells the story and moves it forward.

As the play unfolds we hear musical references about what has already happened but the music does not really repeat itself. Hence, each piece of music seems to build on whatever we’ve already heard.

But what also struck me is how much of the musical is driven by dance. It’s an intragil part of the score.

In the opening number of West Side, the Prologue, this dance/music connection is evident. The choreography of Robbins is underlined by the music of Bernstein but there are no lyrics. With no words the music and dance alone sets up the play, offers a subtle foreshadowing, prepares the audience for the tragic story which follows. (Slight pause,)

Now, several years later Sondheim wrote the music and the lyrics for A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. In an out of town tryout this show was at first a total dud. People were walking out before the end of the first act.

Why? The first song people heard was Love Is in the Air. Jerome Robbins was called in to consult and asked the writers a key question: what is this show about?

Answer: it’s not about love in the air. This is farce, a comedy. The writers then realized the audience needed to be told what this story was about.

So Love Is in the Air was ditched and Sondheim wrote: “Something familiar / Something peculiar/ Something for everyone— a comedy tonight! // Something appealing / Something appalling / Something for everyone— a comedy tonight!”

That song was not at all subtle. It told the audience to be ready to laugh, be ready for a comedic story. Overnight the show suddenly worked. At times we do need to know what to expect, whether it’s subtle or blunt, in order to understand what something is about. (Slight pause.)

We find these words in the work known as Jeremiah: “…Yahweh said to me, ‘Do not say, “I am too young.” Go to wherever and to whomever I send you. Say whatever I command you. Do not fear anyone, for I am with you to protect you,….’” (Slight pause.)

The first chapter of this work is often labeled as the “Call of Jeremiah.” That means, specifically, the summons of God to Jeremiah. But is that what this is about, simply a call to the prophet, or is there more going on?

I think it may help us if we try to look at the big picture. I say that because of the admonition of Yahweh, God, to Jeremiah (quote): “Do not say, ‘I am too young.’”

The writing is clear. Jeremiah’s complaint is about not being able to do the will of God because of inadequacy, not being qualified. But Scripture is riddled with people who feel inadequate, unqualified or just unable to do the will of God. These range from Moses who claims to be insufficiently glib to speak with the Pharaoh to the plea of Jesus who asks God to let the cup pass.

One might loosely call these reasons for not wanting to acquiesce to the call of God a lack sufficient qualifications or a lack of will or even trepidation. But we need to remember two things: God does not call the qualified. God qualifies the called. And of most importance, God walks with us. (Quote:) “I am with you to protect you.” (Slight pause.)

In many ways this passage is, for me, personal. I know something about giving God reasons for not wanting to do the thing to which I was called. Over time a number of people suggested to me— no they did not suggest; they directly told me— people told me I should go to seminary.

After I reached a certain age— my early 30s— I insisted the reason for not going to seminary is I was by far too old to do that. Graduate studies— that’s for younger folks.

But I did enter seminary and it was at the age of 44. Yep— no doubt about it— I was too old. And now I’ve been in the pulpit for better than 30 years. How did that happen? (Slight pause.)

Not going to seminary earlier may have been a poor choice or a good one. But this is clear to me: answering a call is about the choices we make. I first made a choice to not go to seminary and then I did. I’m sure we all have days on which we feel like we’ve made poor choices and we feel we’ve made good choices.

But I think the choices we make are less important than the relationships to which we hold fast. And it’s relationship— singular, one on one, and relationships, plural, with many people— which have seen me through my time in ministry.

So this is my take: if we go about the work of building relationships with one another, God walks with us. So I maintain the message offered in this passage is if we strive to be about relationships and continue to build relationships, God walks with us no matter what choices we make. (Slight pause.)

There are many writings which open by telling you what they are about. Some, like West Side Story, do it with subtle foreshadowing. Some, like a Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, are just blunt, no foreshadowing.

When it comes to Scripture the first words of the Gospel of Mark, for instance, are not subtle. (Quote:) “Here begins the Gospel of Jesus, the Christ, Child of God.” That bluntly tells you what this work is going to be about.

I think the opening chapter of Jeremiah is not just about the call of Jeremiah. It is subtlety engaged in foreshadowing. It tells us what the rest of this scroll is about— walking with God. And the life and ministry of this prophet illustrates the journey. But you’ll have to read the rest of the scroll to understand that.

In fact, the basic message in the entire scroll of Jeremiah says God wants us to be in relationship with God and God wants us to be in relationships with each other. And that is the real the call God has for all of us— relationships matter. Amen.

Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine
08/24/2025

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “To follow up on my comments today, I am convinced of this. God calls each of us as individuals and all of us collectively to a community of faith. Once we choose a community of faith— note: this is our choice— then God leaves it up to each of us individually and all of us collectively to ask what is the task, the work of each of us individually and all of us collectively— what work will we be called in the context of that community of faith. So, to what in the context of this community of faith are you being called by God? And what action are you prepared to take to strengthen relationships as you answer that call?”

BENEDICTION: May God bless us and keep us. May the face of God shine upon us and be gracious to us. May God look upon us with kindness and give us peace. May the God of joy fill us with the power of the Holy Spirit, that we may abound in hope. And may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God, that we are in awe of no one else and nothing else. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 08/17/2025 ~ “The Cloud of Witnesses”

08/17/2025 ~ Tenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 15 ~ Twentieth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Isaiah 5:1-7; Psalm 80:1-2, 8-19; Jeremiah 23:23-29; Psalm 82; Hebrews 11:29-12:2; Luke 12:49-56

YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUdANpaJVvE

VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/1111346121

NOTE: VIMEO may require an account to look at the video. Setting up an account is free.

“Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside everything that impedes us and the sin, all that destroys, which so easily entangles us. Let us run with perseverance the race that is laid out before us.” — Hebrews 12:1.

I have on occasion I have told you about my background as a writer in theater. Today I’d like to say something about how I got there, some steps on that journey.

The journey started fairly early, probably when I was somewhere between the ages of eight and ten. I came down with the measles— not uncommon back then.

Needing to be in bed for a time, I asked for a pencil and notebook. I was determined to outline a novel. I did not get far since I found writing in bed quite uncomfortable.

My desire to write was already there, perhaps some talent, if not the skill. And yes, writing is a talent but, if you have that talent, it’s also a skill which can be and needs to be honed.

Now, I’ve always said the difference between someone who just writes and a professional writer is how the first draft gets done. A professional writes several drafts in their head. Thereby a professional is working on a third draft before they begin to record things in a place someone else can read the words— a piece of paper, a computer.

So, how did I learn about writing in my head first? In my Junior year in High School once a week when I arrived at Mr. Marsh’s English class, five topics would be on the board. The assignment: in no more than 20 minutes write an essay about one of those topics.

But do it in this way: fill up only one side of a loose leaf sheet. Go over to the other side of that sheet— points off. Fall short of the last line on that sheet— points off. That think before you write method necessary to avoid falling short or going long on that last line of the loose leaf sheet, taught me about organizing— writing first drafts in my head.

To jump to some professional steps on the journey, a milestone for me was when I was invited— and you have to be invited, you have to be have known therefore in the community of theater— I was invited to become a member of the ASCAP Musical Comedy Workshop. ASCAP is the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers. This was a master class in writing musicals supervised by the late Charles Strouse, the composer of Annie among many others.

But before the ASCAP workshop I had also attended the BMI— Broadcast Music Incorporated— workshop because one composer with whom I worked was a member there. This master class was run by Lehman Engel, a well known conductor of Broadway shows. And when I say ‘well known conductor’ he was the original conductor of Funny Girl. He taught Barbra Streisand the score.

At that venue I learned necessary, intertwined, skills. First, know as much as possible about where you’re trying go before you start. Second in order to effectively do that, you have a familiarity with the literature of musical theater.

Therefore, you need to know about the great composers and lyricists— Kern, Sondheim, Gershwin— both Ira and George, Rodgers and Hart and Hammerstein, Kander and Ebb etc., etc., etc.— and what they had done. So you also needed to know about the shows the greats wrote which broke new ground— Show Boat, Porgy and Bess, Pal Joey, Oklahoma, Cabaret, Sunday in the Park with George.

Last, you need to know what’s current. Speaking of ground breaking and current, can you say Hamilton? So you need to know what has gone before you, where things are now and once you’re immersed in all that perhaps you can figure out where you might go.

At the BMI workshop Mr. Engel often said this (quote:) “If you don’t know what was here before you arrived, it’s hard to know what really works and what is doomed to close on opening night.” (Slight pause.)

We find these words in the work known as Hebrews: “Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside everything that impedes us and the sin, all that destroys, which so easily entangles us. Let us run with perseverance the race that is laid out before us.” (Slight pause.)

There is a specific claim made in Judaism and Christianity. These faiths, these traditions are based in history. Yes, there are many individual stories in Scripture. But the overriding story is the history of the interaction of God with humanity and humanity with God.

Please note: the writer of Hebrews is not reciting the story of Sarah and Abraham because there will be a quiz. This writer is not concerned with who did it but how they did it. This passage addresses where we, humanity, have been, where we might be now, and is thereby, laying out a path forward.

The process of relationship is what that long and complex history is about. Indeed, you probably noticed, based on how the notation of this reading is presented in the bulletin, some verses were skipped over.

But in the verses we did hear, the words “by faith” are repeated over and over. So, guess what was in the verses we skipped over? There was more information about the history of the relationship of God with humanity and humanity with God.

That history ranged from Moses to Gideon to Sampson to David to Samuel. And guess what words were used to describe that history? Yep— “By faith.”

So, this writer is not actually concerned with the particulars of the stories, who did what when. This is about the process depicted by the story, the process called faith.

That leaves us with a question: at the end of this history where does faith lead us? The writer of Hebrews supplies the answer. It leads us to Jesus— Jesus, who, by faith, trusts God. (Slight pause.)

So what is the lesson we are to learn about faith? (Slight pause.) I want to suggest the lesson is simple and straightforward: God never gives up on us. God never gives up on calling us to follow. But in order to know that, it might be helpful to grapple with what has come before us, helpful to know the literature and its lessons.

Indeed, this “cloud of witnesses” about whom we hear is not simply a group of spectators who turn out to see who might win this metaphoric race to which the author refers. This particular group of observers are not merely bystanders.

Rather, they have received and understood the history of God with humanity and humanity with God. Therefore, the witnesses are not lined up on the roadway to encourage those who follow. They are present and real to offer their example. And we are the one’s who are called to learn from their example and to follow. (Slight pause.)

Let me come back to what I learned in those master classes. Yes, it’s important to know where you’ve been and where you’re at before you can figure out where you’re going.

But this is about the process, not the details, not the facts. In Hebrews the process is called faith. And we heard about the faith which preceded us over and over and over again in the reading: (quote:) “by faith,” “by faith,” “by faith.” (Slight pause.)

Well, I think there really is a cloud of witnesses who have gone before us and set out a path to follow. So let me say something very personal about that. I’ve spent better than thirty years in the pulpit. And even though I’ve been a the Kellogg Church a relatively short time, as I look at the faces in this congregation what I see is your faith and your faithfulness.

But my mind’s eye, my mind’s eye also sees the faces of those with whom I’ve walked as a pastor over the years. I see the faces of those whose faith throughout this race called life have supported, just as you do here, various communities of faith. The people I see in my mind’s eye are a real cloud of witnesses for me and I shall never forget their faithfulness. (Slight pause.)

You know, we Americans tend to make a mistake about church. We tend to think of church as a building, a place to which you go. It’s not. Church is a family to which we belong. And that family includes this great cloud of witnesses throughout the ages.

Hence, it is up to us to keep the work of those who have gone before us active and vital. It is up to us to be examples, to be a cloud of witnesses, for those who will follow us.

Put another way, we should not simply be a group of spectators who turn out to see who might win the metaphoric race. After all, we need to remember faith is not a spectator sport. And faith is not even a feeling. Faith is an action.

Faith supports, encourages, loves and nurtures. So let us be about the process called faith on this day and every day as we, this community of faith, this cloud of witnesses, runs the race. Amen.

08/17/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine.

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “At the start of my comments today I addressed some of my steps on my journey toward being a writer. I think it is well to remember life is not a goal. Life is a journey. Faith is not a goal. Faith is a journey.”

BENEDICTION: The loving kindness of God, the steadfast love of God, is always present to us. Therefore, may we love God so much, that we love nothing else too much. May we be so in awe of God, that we are in awe of no one else and nothing else. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 08/10/2025 ~ “WORRY”

08/10/2025 ~ Ninth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 14 ~ Nineteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Isaiah 1:1, 10-20; Psalm 50:1-8, 22-23; Genesis 15:1-6; Psalm 33:12-22; Hebrews 11:1-3, 8-16; Luke 12:32-40 ~ YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDr5Hzyv9-8 ~ VIDEO OF FULL SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701/video/1109706864

Worry

“But Abram said, ‘O my Sovereign, my God, what will you give me, what good are these blessings to me, so long as Sarai and I will die in disgrace?’” — Genesis 15:2.

I am something of a throwback. You see, while I was still a student at Bangor Theological Seminary I was called to be an Associate Pasror at a five church cooperative in Waldo County. So while still in school I was already a working pastor.

To be clear, what happened was what we Congregationalists label as a “called” pastor, meaning this was not simply a student position. And being “called” while still in seminary made me a throwback because, whereas this kind of thing happened regularly in the mid to late 1800s, it’s rare these days. So here’s a story about that time in my life. (Slight pause.)

Did you ever feel like you needed to be two places at the same time? I had a scheduled visit with a couple in one of those churches. But— still a student— I also knew I had to complete a paper due the next day. And so I needed to be in two places at once— writing a paper while at the same time fulfilling this commitment.

What happened is still a vivid memory for me. The folks I was visiting greeted me graciously, invited me to sit and have tea and cookies— why yes, thank you.

As we sat, chatted and nibbled, the paper which was due was prickling the back of my mind, sometimes the front of my mind, worrying me. As we sat, chatted and nibbled I noticed the husband in this couple was quite taciturn— let out only an occasional grunt.

The woman, on the other hand, needed no prompting. She told story after story, talked about everything from the weather to the local High School sports teams.

And throughout all this chitchat, I was still being by far too self centered. I kept thinking, ‘I am sitting here listening to this small talk when I really need to be back in Bangor doing what I need to — get that paper done!’ (Slight pause.)

Well, at one point she excused herself. A silence encircled the room as the husband and I sat staring at each other. I sipped some tea and smiled not knowing what to say. Finally he broke the silence.

“She has cancer, you know.” (Long pause.)

“No,” said I. “I did not know that.”

“She never brings it up. It does not seem to worry her. She has hope. And you just found this out— she does… like… to chat.” (Long pause.)

We find these words in the Hebrew Scripture in the Torah in the work commonly called Genesis: “But Abram said, ‘O my Sovereign, my God, what will you give me, what good are these blessings to me, so long as Sarai and I will die in disgrace?’”

We get worried about all kinds of things. I was worried about that paper. Because of that, it felt I was wasting my time listening to small talk. Was I? I think not.

But in that moment, that’s not what I was thinking. And yes, I probably needed to be sitting there with them rather than worrying about what I had to do. (Pause.)

In some ways this story was about how we interact with each other so let’s look at a different aspect of how interacting with each other happens. Suppose you’re introduced to someone for the first time. Often, not too far into that conversation one or the other of you will say, “Well, what do you do for a living or if retired, “what did you do for a living?”

Question: does saying what you do or did really say anything about who you are? No. It only says something about what you do or did. Too often we confuse the two— what we do or what we’ve done as opposed to who we are.

That leads me to a question: Who is God? Notice, the question is not what does God do? The question is Who is God?

I think often we relegate God to a function. We offer a job description as if that was making a claim about who God is. We even have the audacity to ask God, ‘What have You done for me lately?’

That is, effectively, the question Abram asks God (quote:) “…what will you give me, what good are these blessings to me, so long as Sarai and I will die in disgrace?” And yes, that question does come from how the culture of ancient times functioned.

Ancient cultures thought of the gods— that’s gods plural as ancient cultures thought there were and believed in multiple gods— they thought of the gods as fulfilling specific functions. And the ancients thought to die childless was a disgrace and usually attributed that producing of children function to some god. We know that concept leaked into the Hebrew culture.

Indeed, if a question about supplying an heir is not about a function, not about asking God, ‘what have You done for me lately?’ I don’t know what is. So the very question a) comes from the culture and b) says very little about Who God is.

Please notice, I am at least suggesting the appropriate question here is Who is God? And one of the things I think we fail to realize about the story Scripture relates— all Scripture, not just this story— all Scripture comes down to a very simple concept we find in any story. So let’s ask the question which needs to be posed: in this story who is this particular character we call God? (Slight pause.)

God, you see, is the main character in Scripture. And there is a second main character— Israel. Further, I would argue those two— God and Israel— are not just the main characters in Scripture. They are the only two characters in Scripture.

All of which is to say— to use very traditional language— God is a Person. Or as the language of Trinitarianism states, God is three Persons but One God. I think one reason we forget about the concept of the personhood of God is because too often instead of asking about our relationship with God we ask this question of God: “What have you done for me lately?”

We thereby turn God into a function rather than someone Who lives, someone to Whom we need to relate, someone with Whom we need to be in relationship, someone with Whom we need to be emotionally involved. And that leaves yet another question: what is the overall story we find in Scripture really about? (Slight pause.)

To me this is clear: the stories in Scripture are not about results, results like producing an offspring, a child. The stories in Scripture, this story in particular, is about hope. And God is a God of hope. God the person is about hope. So who is God? God is a character Who expresses hope.

After all, what is it God is really promising? God is not promising a baby. (Quote:) “Look at the sky and count the stars, if you can! As many stars as are in the sky so shall your descendants be.” That is a promise framed in poetry and because it is framed in poetry that is a promise about hope. (Slight pause.)

When it comes to the story of God I think it’s up to us— as the new Israel we are one of the two characters in Scripture— it’s up to us to tell the story about the other character in Scripture— God. It’s up to us to say who God is and to say how we relate to God. And the story told of God in Scripture says God is a God of hope, about hope, about hopefulness. That’s who God is.

Why would I say that? The story of God is a story about someone who loves us. And since God loves us there is no better reason than that for us to hope. Why? Love is, I think, the ultimate expression of hope. Amen.

08/10/2025
Elijah Kellogg Church, Harpswell, Maine

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is a précis of what was said: “Several weeks ago I quoted Anglican theologian Nicholas Thomas Wright. This quote is also from Wright and I take the topic to be hope. (Quote:) ‘Western Christians tend to think of going to heaven or going to hell as the framework of the Bible. But the Bible is not a story about us going somewhere. It is a story about the Creator God coming to live with us.’— Nicholas Thomas Wright. I think God coming to live with us defines hope. Perhaps what is up to us to do is to be disciples of God, disciples who spread the word of hope.”

BENEDICTION: Through God’s grace, by being attentive to God’s will, our deeds and our words will change our world for we will discover ways to proclaim release from the bondage of narrowness. Let us seek the God of hope Whose wisdom is endless. Let us go in peace to love and serve God. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SERMON ~ 08/03/2025 ~ “MIRIAM AND AARON OR PROPHET SHARING”

08/03/2025 ~ Eighth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Proper 13 ~ Eighteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Hosea 11:1-11; Psalm 107:1-9, 43; Ecclesiastes 1:2, 12-14; 2:18-23; Psalm 49:1-12; Colossians 3:1-11; Luke 12:13-21 ~ NOTE: the Lectionary Readings Were Not Used. The Scripture Below Was Used

YOUTUBE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJvaHHZcY1U

VIDEO OF SERVICE: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7960701/video/1107738993

NOTE: THE PORTION WHICH IS THE COMMUNION HAS BEEN DELETED

INTRODUCTION TO SCRIPTURE

This reading has two segments: the first tells about the crossing of The Sea of Reeds. This journey has commonly been connected to The Red Sea but that event is much more likely to have been the crossing of a marshland, a sea of reeds. To be clear, the Exodus, this journey, is considered by be the primal, saving story in the Hebrew Scriptures, a tale of liberation, freedom and hence a clear disclosure about the nature of God. Therefore, to see this story as merely a miracle is to fall short of understanding its implications. The second segment of the reading is found at the end of the 15th chapter of Exodus. Most of the 15th chapter is comprised of what is commonly called The Song of Moses. At the end of the that chapter we hear what is commonly called The Song of Miriam— Miriam bring the sister of Moses and Aaron. We know The Song of Miriam is a much older text than The Song of Moses. So it’s likely these words are the initial description of the primal event in the history of Israel and is recorded as being intoned by a woman. Hear now this Word as it is found in that portion of the Torah known as Exodus.

A READING FROM THE TANAKH IN THE SECTION KNOWN AS THE TORAH — Exodus 14:19-24, 15:19-21 [ILV]

[19] The angel of God, who was going before the Israelites, moved and went behind them; the pillar of cloud left the front of their number and took its place behind them, between the Israelites and the Egyptians. [20] All through the night the cloud provided light to one side and darkness to the other side, so there was no contact between them.

[21] Then Moses stretched out a hand over the sea. And Yahweh, God, swept back the sea by a strong east wind throughout the night and so turned the sea into dry land. When the waters were thus divided, [22] the Israelites marched into its midst on dry land, with water on their right and on their left.

[23] The Egyptians followed in pursuit and went into the midst of sea after them, all of Pharaoh’s horses, chariots, and chariot drivers. [24] At the morning watch, at dawn, Yahweh, God, looked down upon the Egyptian forces from the fiery cloud, and threw the army into confusion and panic, clogging their chariot wheels so that they could hardly turn. The Egyptians turned to flee from the Israelites, saying, “Their God fights for them against us.”

[15:19] Once the horses, chariots and chariot drivers came into the seabed, Yahweh let the water collapse upon them. But the Israelites had walked through the seabed on dry ground.

[20] Then Aaron’s sister, the prophet Miriam, picked up a tambourine and all the women followed dancing, also carrying tambourines, [21] while Miriam sang to them:

“Sing to Yahweh,
Who has triumphed gloriously;
Who has fling horse and rider
into the sea.”

NARRATOR
So what we’re going to do this morning is a play and the title of the play is Miriam and Aaron or Prophet Sharing. The play uses the Exodus event to illustrate how things that happen can illuminate the relationship of humanity with God. The events depicted take place the evening after the people of Israel have crossed the Sea of Reeds. We do need your cooperation and your imagination, so please imagine with me as the curtain rises we see a rock strewn plateau which overlooks the encampment of the Israelites in a valley below. It is night. In the distance we can see there are many campfires burning. There is an occasional flash of lightning and the sound of thunder is heard. And we can also hear people in the distance and they are singing. Now you, this Congregation, have a part in this play. You are the people of Israel. And you are the people we hear singing. That hymn is in the bulletin and you just heard the choir sing it except they did it as a round. You won’t have to do it that way. You can just sing it in a straightforward way using, for those of you who read music, the second ending. O.K. You’re the people of Israel.

CHORUS
I WILL SING UNTO THE LORD,
FOR HE HAS TRIUMPHED GLORIOUSLY;
THE HORSE AND RIDER
THROWN INTO THE SEA!

LORD MY GOD
MY STRENGTH AND SONG
IS NOW MY VICTORY

THE LORD IS GOD AND
I WILL PRAISE HIM,
MY FATHER’S GOD
AND I WILL EXALT HIM.

NARRATOR
As the singing ends Miriam comes on stage and she is laughing, giggling. Aaron also is with her.

MIRIAM
Oh Aaron, Aaron. Isn’t it wonderful? Isn’t it amazing? Who would have believed this? Who could have predicted this? Our bondage is over!

AARON
Marion, you— you could have predicted this.

MIRIAM
Me?

AARON
You do not give yourself enough credit, Miriam. I’ve seen you predict things and they come true as sure as the sun rises.

MIRIAM
Speculate? Yes. Predict? I think not. And this? This is too… too… incredible, beyond anyone’s ability to predict.

AARON
No, no, not at all— it was not only possible. It was predictable. And these things all came about because you had a hand in them! You are the one who is most likely to have seen these times coming. How could you fail to see them coming?

MIRIAM
But I had no hand in vanquishing the Pharaoh. It was not I who set our people free. It was not I who led the escape from the land of our oppression.

AARON
Oppression is never overcome in a single day or by a single individual. It takes years, decades, many people, thousands of people, doing small things, working, building toward freedom. Then when the timing is right… no, no, no… when Yahweh’s timing is right, it just happens! And you don’t seem to understand that you’ve had a great hand in this night, Miriam. You will be remembered by many for what you have done.

MIRIAM
But what is it that I did?

AARON
Still you don’t know?

MIRIAM
I am at a loss.

AARON
(He now becomes a reluctant teacher.) O.K. Very well. I’ll explain. Our brother, Moses, and I went to Pharaoh and said “Thus says Yahweh, the God of Israel, ‘Let my people go, that they may hold a feast unto me in the wilderness.’” Who was it who sent Moses to do this thing, to say these things to Pharaoh, and who told him that these things would come to pass?

MIRIAM
(Hesitantly.) I did not do that. It was the God of our ancestors, the God of Abraham and Sarah, of Isaac and Rebekah and Jacob and Rachel Who sent Moses.

AARON
(With a small chuckle.) Yes, very good. O.K. Now, why did Moses believe Yahweh?

MIRIAM
As incredible as this sounds, Yahweh spoke to Moses from a burning bush! After all, who would not believe a command given from the midst of a burning bush which fails to consume? And who would fail to believe when right in front of them a rod is turned into a serpent or a hand is made leprous and then made well again in the blink of an eye?

AARON
Why yes, anyone who has an experience of God believes. But I want you to think about this with a broader perspective. This is not about how Moses believed God but why Moses believed God is faithful. (Slight pause.) Tell me, who was it who taught Moses about the God of our ancestors?

MIRIAM
Well, Mother and… (She begins to realize what she is about to say and her voice trails off in wonderment.) …I, we both took turns… No! Why, we never dreamt telling Moses about Yahweh would result in this!

AARON
Of course, you didn’t. You didn’t dream of a night like this, a night of freedom, a night when God’s salvation becomes real and tangible, bound as we were in slavery. Who would have believed the reality or this night? But without your part in teaching Moses about the God of our ancestors he never would have stopped to hear Yahweh speak! As soon as he saw the bush, he would have run away. He would have been just another shepherd having delusions from too much desert sun! But now we have our freedom. Because Moses believed and listened to Yahweh! And you did it! You taught Moses. You were part of a hope that would not die, a legacy that we pass from generation to generation. And Yahweh, God, saw our affliction, heard our cries and delivered us out of the hands of our oppressors and shall bring us to a land flowing with milk and honey all because Moses knew to trust God! And where did Moses learn that lesson? From you!

MIRIAM
Aaron, you are always the politician!

AARON
Am I?

MIRIAM
You go on and on. You enjoy hearing yourself speak.

AARON
(He chuckles.) You cut me to the quick. But you’re right. I do enjoy hearing myself speak. But it is you to whom Moses first listened.

MIRIAM
No. Moses listened to Yahweh.

AARON
You are too modest.

MIRIAM
I am too honest.

AARON
And you’re not a politician? Will you tell this politician what it is you told Moses when he was a boy and lived in the palace of the Pharaoh?

MIRIAM
Why?

AARON
Curiosity.

MIRIAM
Killed the cat.

AARON
We do not kill cats either in Egypt where they worship cats nor outside of Egypt where we use them to catch rodents. But really, I am interested in hearing what you said, how you told the story of our people to Moses. Maybe if I hear you tell it to me I can then say it to my children, convey the same meanings and the feelings you imparted to Moses.

MIRIAM
What is it I told Moses? (Pause.) Over the years it was so much. Of course, it started with the stories of Abram. But I don’t think I was very concerned with the facts of the stories. Mother was. I can never remember details. I am much more concerned with what things mean than with the facts.

AARON
So tell me, what did you say to Moses about the story of Abram?

MIRIAM
Well, I told him of Abram’s obedience when God said leave the land of Haran and promised to make Abram a great nation, that the offspring of Abram would be as numerous as the stars. And Abram packed up the family, crossed miles of desert to Shechem, to Egypt, always in obedience, never questioning. And the covenants! God’s promises! I said God was personal, real, familial! And I also said God keeps God’s promises. Is our freedom now not proof of this? And yes, it has taken time. But God’s timing seems to apply. Often we have to wait and often we do not understand what it is God has promised but God always follows through on what God promises.
AARON
Tell me more about God and Abram.

MIRIAM
Well, God changed the name of this ancestor from Abram to Abraham, changed the name of Sarai to Sarah. This naming was an outward sign of the covenant. And then God gave them a son in their old age. Such a joy to have a son! And this (she sweeps her hand toward the congregation), all this, this nation, these people, will be God’s congregation from that seed!

AARON
So what have we learned from Abraham?

MIRIAM
God loves us. God will provide.

AARON
And what of Isaac.

MIRIAM
The child named laughter.

AARON
The child God would have Abraham destroy.

MIRIAM
But God did not have Abraham destroy Isaac.

AARON
No.

MIRIAM
No! God provided for the sacrifice when all seemed lost. Trust! That is what we must learn about God! Trust!

AARON
That’s hard sometimes.

MIRIAM
Is it ever easy?

AARON
Well… no.

MIRIAM
Trust is, indeed, also one of the things we learn from Isaac. Trust and God will provide.

AARON
Trust? Yes, but the stories about Isaac make life seem so easy. It’s easy to trust when life is easy.

MIRIAM
Is that so? Life was easy? May you be blessed with two son’s like Esau and Jacob and we’ll see how easy life is for you!

AARON
I see your point. So… you said that from the story of Isaac and Rebekah the people should learn something of trusting God, but what is it you told Moses of Jacob? (Playing the devil’s advocate.) What is it you could have told Moses about Jacob— Jacob, the conniver— Jacob the schemer. How could you have said anything good about him?

MIRIAM
Jacob, the one who wrestled with God?

AARON
Yes, Jacob the one who wrestled with God.

MIRIAM
That is the simple story.

AARON
Simple?

MIRIAM
Yes. If you wrestle with God, grapple with God, then you may be the weakest clay that God, the potter, has but God will mold you into the finest pot, fit for use at any table, at Yahweh’s table! And if you wrestle with God your name shall be called Israel, for you have striven with God.

AARON
You amaze me.

MIRIAM
How?

AARON
You have spun out the history of our salvation, our freedom, in these few minutes. It’s no wonder Moses listened to you. You have summed up the meaning of our relationship with Yahweh.

MIRIAM
You are mistaken. It is not possible to really say in mere words what our relationship with Yahweh means.

AARON
Even as you say it, I know you are right. I have experienced Yahweh, God, and yet I can not express what it feels like— not fully, not adequately. Maybe that’s why I asked to hear you talk about it. There is no way to express the inexpressible, is there?

MIRIAM
Only in metaphor, Aaron.

AARON
Ah! The only way that we can describe the unspeakable is to speak, not with our mouths, but with our hearts, with our emotions, to say things with song and dance and stories, to speak of the deepest truths and to be free to express our feelings about God with our imagination.

MIRIAM
Well said, my brother. And we must continue to tell and retell each other the stories. We must remember Yahweh with these stories, for there is no other way to describe the experience of Yahweh.

AARON
It will be as you say, Miriam. We shall, we will retell the stories of our ancestors and we will retell the story of this night forever.

MIRIAM
There is one thing I would like to know from you, one thing that I would like you to explain.

AARON
As if I could. (Pause.) Well, what is it?

MIRIAM
We have now escaped the land of Egypt, the land of our oppression but what does that mean?

AARON
I, for one, don’t care what it means.

MIRIAM
Why not?

AARON
We can only know meaning partially and only then in the past. I have no wish to know what it means. The only thing that I want to know is what’s gong to happen next?

MIRIAM
That (pause) I can answer!

AARON
See, I knew you were a prophet!

MIRIAM
(She shouts.) Whatever will happen will happen in Yahweh’s timing!

NARRATOR
At that point Miriam runs offstage. Aaron stands there for a moment stunned and realizes what she has said.

AARON
Why yes! How could it be otherwise! Whatever will happen will happen in Yahweh’s timing.

NARRATOR
As Aaron leaves there is again a bolt of lightening and a roll of thunder. The curtain comes down, the people of Israel are heard singing in the distance. (The Narrator motions to the congregation to sing.)

CHORUS
I WILL SING UNTO THE LORD,
FOR HE HAS TRIUMPHED GLORIOUSLY;
THE HORSE AND RIDER
THROWN INTO THE SEA!

LORD MY GOD
MY STRENGTH AND SONG
IS NOW MY VICTORY

THE LORD IS GOD AND
I WILL PRAISE HIM,
MY FATHER’S GOD
AND I WILL EXALT HIM.

NARRATOR
The end!

THE END

ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is a précis of what was said: “I am sure you noticed the opening hymn was the Spiritual Go Down Moses. The enslaved community from which many spirituals come understood that the salvation history found in Scripture started with the stories in the Torah. They also understood the Biblical meaning of the word salvation was not some pie in the sky by and by idea. The Biblical meaning of the word salvation is God’s gift of freedom. We hit some of the high points of the salvation history in the Torah today, so it would be wise of us to understand salvation starts with God’s freedom.”

BENEDICTION: We have observed this day to honor God, Who promises to be with us. And we have been claimed as Christ’s own. Therefore the Spirit is present to us. And because of the reality of the Trinity we are taught to value every person. So may the reality of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses our understanding, keep our hearts and minds in the love, knowledge and companionship of the Holy Spirit this day and forevermore. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment